Investigate Islam

Blog

  • Allah cut off Muhammad’s life, artery, aorta because he lied

    Allah cut off Muhammad’s life, artery, aorta because he lied

    First the video speak about clean was Muhammad

    Narrated Maimuna: (the wife of the Prophet) During my menses, I never prayed, but used to sit on the mat beside the mosque of Allah’s Apostle. He used to offer the prayer on his sheet and in prostration some of his clothes used to touch me.” (Book #6, Hadith #329)

    Flag in the ASS of a Muslim?

    It is narrated on the authority of Abu Sa’id that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: On the Day of Judgment there will be a flag fixed behind the buttocks of every person guilty of the breach of faith.  (Book #019, Hadith #4309)

    Muhammad death exposing as a false prophet:

    Narrated Ibn Abbas: ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab used to let Ibn Abbas sit beside him, so ‘AbdurRahman bin ‘Auf said to ‘Umar, “We have sons similar to him.” ‘Umar replied, “(I respect him) because of his status that you know.” ‘Umar then asked Ibn ‘Abbas about the meaning of this Holy Verse:– “When comes the help of Allah and the conquest of Mecca . . .” (110.1) Ibn ‘Abbas replied, “That indicated the death of Allah’s Apostle which Allah informed him of.” ‘Umar said, “I do not understand of it except what you understand.” Narrated ‘Aisha: The Prophet in his ailment in which he died, used to say, “O ‘Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison.”  (Book #59, Hadith #713)

    Qur’an 69:46
    Tafsir al-Jalalayn

    { ثُمَّ لَقَطَعْنَا مِنْهُ ٱلْوَتِينَ }

    then We would have assuredly severed his life-artery, the aorta of the heart, a vein that connects with it, and which if severed results in that person’s death,
    Muhammad made his verse about how Allah he will kill him if he is False Prophet but he never thought he will die in such a way and he will even say before his death such words “O ‘Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison.”  (Book #59, Hadith #713)
    and I believe the one made Muhammad die in such death is our Lord not Allah the false god in order to exposing him for us so the deceived will see the truth.

    Galatians 1:8

    But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

  • Killing kids in Islam is an order by Allah even to Muslims kids

    Killing kids in Islam is an order by Allah even to Muslims kids

    تفسير Tafsir al-Jalalayn

    { فَٱنْطَلَقَا حَتَّىٰ إِذَا لَقِيَا غُلاَماً فَقَتَلَهُ قَالَ أَقَتَلْتَ نَفْساً زَكِيَّةً بِغَيْرِ نَفْسٍ لَّقَدْ جِئْتَ شَيْئاً نُّكْراً } Qur’an 18 :74

    So they set off, after leaving the ship, making their way on foot, until, when they met a boy, who had not yet reached puberty, playing with [other] boys, among whom his face was the fairest — and he, al-Khidr, slew him, by slitting his throat with a knife while he lay down, or by tearing his head off with his hand, or by smashing his head against a wall, all of which are [different] opinions (the coordinating fā’ [of fa-qatalahu, ‘and he slew him’] is used here because [it indicates that] the slaying took place after the encounter; the response to idhā, ‘when’ is [the following statement, qāla …]) — he, Moses, said, to him: ‘Have you slain an innocent soul, that is, a pure one that had not reached the age of [legal] responsibility (a variant reading [for zākiya] has zakiyya), [one slain] not in retaliation for another soul?, in other words, one that has not slain any soul. Verily you have committed an dreadful thing’ (read nukran or nukuran), that is to say, an abomination.
    to see Muslims site click King of Jordan site
    Qur’an 18:80

    تفسير Tafsir al-Jalalayn

    { وَأَمَّا ٱلْغُلاَمُ فَكَانَ أَبَوَاهُ مُؤْمِنَيْنِ فَخَشِينَآ أَن يُرْهِقَهُمَا طُغْيَاناً وَكُفْراً }

    And as for the boy, his parents were believers and We feared lest he should overwhelm them with insolence and disbelief — for he is as [described] by the hadīth of Muslim, ‘He was [incorrigibly] disposed to disbelief, and had he lived [longer] this [disposition of his] would have oppressed them, because of their love for him, they would have followed him in such [a path of disbelief]’.
  • What it dose mean to be a Muslim and is Jesus a Muslim?

    What it dose mean to be a Muslim and is Jesus a Muslim?

  • The Father of Moses became the Father of Mary Qur’an error

    The Father of Moses became the Father of Mary Qur’an error

    As we know the name of the father of Moses is Amram in the bible but the false Prophet Muhammad he got it wrong again and he made the father or Moses as th father of Mary mother of Jesus, and he made Aaron the brother of Mary(mother of Jesus).

    Who is Amram in the bible?

    ◄ Exodus 6 ►
    King James Bible

    God Promises Deliverance

    1Then the LORD said unto Moses, Now shalt thou see what I will do to Pharaoh: for with a strong hand shall he let them go, and with a strong hand shall he drive them out of his land.

    2And God spake unto Moses, and said unto him, I am the LORD: 3And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.4And I have also established my covenant with them, to give them the land of Canaan, the land of their pilgrimage, wherein they were strangers. 5And I have also heard the groaning of the children of Israel, whom the Egyptians keep in bondage; and I have remembered my covenant. 6Wherefore say unto the children of Israel, I am the LORD, and I will bring you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians, and I will rid you out of their bondage, and I will redeem you with a stretched out arm, and with great judgments: 7And I will take you to me for a people, and I will be to you a God: and ye shall know that I am the LORD your God, which bringeth you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians. 8And I will bring you in unto the land, concerning the which I did swear to give it to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob; and I will give it you for an heritage: I amthe LORD. 9And Moses spake so unto the children of Israel: but they hearkened not unto Moses for anguish of spirit, and for cruel bondage.

     

    Qur’an 19:28
    Sahih International
    O sister of Aaron, your father was not a man of evil, nor was your mother unchaste.”
    http://quran.com/19/28

    Qur’an 3:35

    Sahih International
    [Mention, O Muhammad], when the wife of ‘Imran said, “My Lord, indeed I have pledged to You what is in my womb, consecrated [for Your service], so accept this from me. Indeed, You are the Hearing, the Knowing.”

     

     

    ر Tafsir (explication) القرطبي – Al-Qortoby
    يَا أُخْتَ هَارُونَ مَا كَانَ أَبُوكِ امْرَأَ سَوْءٍ وَمَا كَانَتْ أُمُّكِ بَغِيًّا (28)
    قوله تعالى : يا أخت هارون اختلف الناس في معنى هذه الأخوة ومن هارون ؟ فقيل : هو هارون أخو موسى ؛ والمراد من كنا نظنها مثل هارون في العبادة تأتي بمثل هذا . وقيل : على هذا كانت مريم من ولد هارون أخي موسى فنسبت إليه بالأخوة ؛ لأنها من ولده ؛ كما يقال للتميمي : يا أخا تميم وللعربي يا أخا العرب ، وقيل : كان لها أخ من أبيها اسمه هارون ؛ لأن هذا الاسم كان كثيرا في بني إسرائيل تبركا باسم هارون أخي موسى ، وكان أمثل رجل في بني إسرائيل ؛ قاله الكلبي .
    وقيل : هارون هذا رجل صالح في ذلك الزمان تبع جنازته يوم مات أربعون ألفا كلهم اسمه هارون . وقال قتادة : كان في ذلك الزمان في بني إسرائيل عابد منقطع إلى الله – عز وجل – يسمى هارون فنسبوها إلى أخوته من حيث كانت على طريقته قبل ؛ إذ كانت موقوفة على خدمة البيع ؛ أي يا هذه المرأة الصالحة ما كنت أهلا لذلك . وقال كعب الأحبار بحضرة عائشة أم المؤمنين – رضي الله عنها – : إن مريم ليست بأخت هارون أخي موسى ؛ فقالت له عائشة : كذبت . فقال لها : يا أم المؤمنين إن كان رسول الله – صلى الله عليه وسلم – قاله فهو أصدق وأخبر ، وإلا فإني أجد بينهما من المدة ستمائة سنة . قال : فسكتت .
    وفي صحيح مسلم عن المغيرة بن شعبة قال : لما قدمت نجران سألوني فقال إنكم تقرءون ( يا أخت هارون ) وموسى قبل عيسى بكذا وكذا ، فلما قدمت على رسول الله – صلى الله عليه وسلم – سألته عن ذلك ، فقال : إنهم كانوا يسمون بأنبيائهم والصالحين قبلهم . وقد جاء في بعض طرقه في غير الصحيح أن النصارى قالوا له : إن صاحبك يزعم أن مريم هي أخت هارون وبينهما في المدة ستمائة سنة ؟ ! قال المغيرة : فلم أدر ما أقول ؛ وذكر الحديث . والمعنى أنه اسم وافق اسما . ويستفاد من هذا جواز التسمية بأسماء الأنبياء ؛ والله أعلم . قلت : فقد دل الحديث الصحيح أنه كان بين موسى وعيسى وهارون زمان مديد . الزمخشري : كان بينهما وبينه ألف سنة أو أكثر فلا يتخيل أن مريم كانت أخت موسى وهارون ؛ وإن صح فكما قال السدي لأنها كانت من نسله ؛ وهذا كما تقول للرجل من قبيلة : يا أخا فلان . ومنه قوله – عليه الصلاة والسلام – : إن أخا صداء قد أذن فمن أذن فهو يقيم وهذا هو القول الأول . ابن عطية : وقالت فرقة : بل كان في ذلك الزمان رجل فاجر اسمه هارون فنسبوها إليه على جهة التعيير والتوبيخ ؛ ذكره الطبري ولم يسم قائله .
    قلت : ذكره الغزنوي عن سعيد بن جبير أنه كان فاسقا مثلا في الفجور فنسبت إليه . والمعنى : ما كان أبوك ولا أمك أهلا لهذه الفعلة فكيف جئت أنت بها ؟ ! وهذا من التعريض الذي يقوم مقام التصريح . وذلك يوجب عندنا الحد وسيأتي في سورة ( النور ) القول فيه إن شاء الله تعالى . وهذا القول الأخير يرده الحديث الصحيح ، وهو نص صريح فلا كلام لأحد معه ، ولا غبار عليه . والحمد لله . وقرأ عمر بن لجأ التيمي ( ما كان أباك امرؤ سوء ) .
    http://quran.ksu.edu.sa/tafseer/qortobi/sura19-aya28.html
  • History errors in the Qur’an or its not an error Mary Sister of Aaron Shabir Ally

    History errors in the Qur’an or its not an error Mary Sister of Aaron Shabir Ally

    Very Clear

    Qur’an Contradiction:

    was Muhammad confused about Mary’s identify, or was Mary really identified with and metaphorically called “sister of Aaron”?

    Mary, Sister of Aaron & Daughter of Amram


    In several Suras the Qur’an confuses Mary the mother of Jesus [Miriam in Hebrew] with Miriam the sister of Aaron and Moses, and daughter of Amram which is about 1400 years off.

    At length she brought (the babe) to her people, carrying him (in her arms), They said: “O Mary! Truly a strange thing has thou brought! “O sister of Aaron, thy father was not a man of evil, nor your mother a woman unchaste!”
    — Sura 19:27-28And Mary, the daughter of `Imran, …
    — Sura 66:12

    وقال كعب الأحبار بحضرة عائشة أم المؤمنين – رضي الله عنها – : إن مريم
    ليست بأخت هارون أخي موسى ؛ فقالت له عائشة : كذبت . فقال لها : يا أم المؤمنين إن كان رسول الله – صلى الله عليه وسلم – قاله فهوأصدق وأخبر ، وإلا فإني أجد بينهما من المدة ستمائة سنة . قال : فسكتت

    http://quran.ksu.edu.sa/tafseer/qortobi/sura19-aya28.html 

    historical

    وله تعالى : يا أخت هارون اختلف الناس في معنى هذه الأخوة ومن هارون ؟ فقيل : هو هارون أخو موسى ؛ والمراد من كنا نظنها مثل هارون في العبادة تأتي بمثل هذا . وقيل : على هذا كانت مريم من ولد هارون أخي موسى فنسبت إليه بالأخوة ؛ لأنها من ولده ؛ كما يقال للتميمي : يا أخا تميم وللعربي يا أخا العرب ، وقيل : كان لها أخ من أبيها اسمه هارون ؛ لأن هذا الاسم كان كثيرا في بني إسرائيل تبركا باسم هارون أخي موسى ، وكان أمثل رجل في بني إسرائيل ؛ قاله الكلبي .
    وقيل : هارون هذا رجل صالح في ذلك الزمان تبع جنازته يوم مات أربعون ألفا كلهم اسمه هارون . وقال قتادة : كان في ذلك الزمان في بني إسرائيل عابد منقطع إلى الله – عز وجل – يسمى هارون فنسبوها إلى أخوته من حيث كانت على طريقته قبل ؛ إذ كانت موقوفة على خدمة البيع ؛ أي يا هذه المرأة الصالحة ما كنت أهلا لذلك . وقال كعب الأحبار بحضرة عائشة أم المؤمنين – رضي الله عنها – : إن مريم ليست بأخت هارون أخي موسى ؛ فقالت له عائشة : كذبت . فقال لها : يا أم المؤمنين إن كان رسول الله – صلى الله عليه وسلم – قاله فهو أصدق وأخبر ، وإلا فإني أجد بينهما من المدة ستمائة سنة . قال : فسكتت .
    وفي صحيح مسلم عن المغيرة بن شعبة قال : لما قدمت نجران سألوني فقال إنكم تقرءون ( يا أخت هارون ) وموسى قبل عيسى بكذا وكذا ، فلما قدمت على رسول الله – صلى الله عليه وسلم – سألته عن ذلك ، فقال : إنهم كانوا يسمون بأنبيائهم والصالحين قبلهم . وقد جاء في بعض طرقه في غير الصحيح أن النصارى قالوا له : إن صاحبك يزعم أن مريم هي أخت هارون وبينهما في المدة ستمائة سنة ؟ ! قال المغيرة : فلم أدر ما أقول ؛ وذكر الحديث . والمعنى أنه اسم وافق اسما . ويستفاد من هذا جواز التسمية بأسماء الأنبياء ؛ والله أعلم . قلت : فقد دل الحديث الصحيح أنه كان بين موسى وعيسى وهارون زمان مديد . الزمخشري : كان بينهما وبينه ألف سنة أو أكثر فلا يتخيل أن مريم كانت أخت موسى وهارون ؛ وإن صح فكما قال السدي لأنها كانت من نسله ؛ وهذا كما تقول للرجل من قبيلة : يا أخا فلان . ومنه قوله – عليه الصلاة والسلام – : إن أخا صداء قد أذن فمن أذن فهو يقيم وهذا هو القول الأول . ابن عطية : وقالت فرقة : بل كان في ذلك الزمان رجل فاجر اسمه هارون فنسبوها إليه على جهة التعيير والتوبيخ ؛ ذكره الطبري ولم يسم قائله .
    قلت : ذكره الغزنوي عن سعيد بن جبير أنه كان فاسقا مثلا في الفجور فنسبت إليه . والمعنى : ما كان أبوك ولا أمك أهلا لهذه الفعلة فكيف جئت أنت بها ؟ ! وهذا من التعريض الذي يقوم مقام التصريح . وذلك يوجب عندنا الحد وسيأتي في سورة ( النور ) القول فيه إن شاء الله تعالى . وهذا القول الأخير يرده الحديث الصحيح ، وهو نص صريح فلا كلام لأحد معه ، ولا غبار عليه . والحمد لله . وقرأ عمر بن لجأ التيمي ( ما كان أباك امرؤ سوء ) .

  • Muhammad and his Satan story

    Muhammad and his Satan story

    1. Is it true that Muhammad was under Satan control?
    2. if yes for how long?
    3. Can we trust some one already admitted that Satan has control on him?
    4. How come Allah couldn’t protect him and he fail his promises in the Quran to protect the Good Muslims from Satan?
    5. is that because Muhammad was a bad Muslim? watch and learn the truth with us.

    “Never sent We a messenger or a prophet before thee but when He recited (the message) Satan proposed (opposition) in respect of that which he recited thereof. But Allah abolisheth that which Satan proposeth. Then Allah establisheth His revelations. Allah is Knower, Wise;

    http://quran.com/22/52
    And Satan saith, when the matter hath been decided: Lo! Allah promised you a promise of truth; and I promised you, then failed you. And I had no power over you save that I called unto you and ye obeyed me. So blame not, but blame yourselves. I cannot help you, nor can ye help me, Lo! I disbelieved in that which ye before ascribed to me. Lo! for wrong-doers is a painful doom.
    http://quran.com/14/22

    Muhsin Khan
    “Certainly, you shall have no authority over My slaves, except those who follow you of the Ghawin (Mushrikun and those who go astray, criminals, polytheists, and evil-doers, etc.).
    http://quran.com/15/42

    Narrated Aisha: magic was worked on Allah’s Apostle so that he used to think that he had Sexual relations with his wives while he actually had not (Sufyan said: That is the hardest kind of magic as it has such an effect). Then one day he said, “O ‘Aisha do you know that Allah has instructed me concerning the matter I asked Him about? Two men came to me and one of them sat near my head and the other sat near my feet. The one near my head asked the other. What is wrong with this man?’ The latter replied the is under the effect of magic The first one asked, Who has worked magic on him?’ The other replied Labid bin Al-A’sam, a man from Bani Zuraiq who was an ally of the Jews and was a hypocrite.’ The first one asked, What material did he use)?’ The other replied, ‘A comb and the hair stuck to it.’ The first one asked, ‘Where (is that)?’ The other replied. ‘In a skin of pollen of a male date palm tree kept under a stone in the well of Dharwan’ ” So the Prophet went to that well and took out those things and said “That was the well which was shown to me (in a dream) Its water looked like the infusion of Henna leaves and its date-palm trees looked like the heads of devils.” The Prophet added, “Then that thing was taken out’ I said (to the Prophet ) “Why do you not treat yourself with Nashra?” He said, “Allah has cured me; I dislike to let evil spread among my people.” (Book #71, Hadith #660) http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=71&translator=1&start=0&number=660#660

  • Kapitulo 5 ng Qur’an For Filipinos

    Kapitulo 5 ng Qur’an For Filipinos

    Kapitulo 5 ng Qur’an

    Qur’an 5:20-26 (Isinalin sa pamamagitan ni Usama Dakdok):
    20. At alalahanin mo, O Muhammad, noong sinabi ni Mousâ (Moises as) sa kanyang sambayanan: “O kayong mga angkan ni Isrâ`îl! Alalahanin ninyo ang kagandahang-loob sa inyo ng Allâh, noong Siya ay nagpadala mula sa inyo ng mga Propeta at ginawa Niya kayong mga hari, na nangangasiwa sa inyo pagkatapos ng pagiging alipin ninyo kay Fir`awn (Pharaon) at sa kanyang mga tauhan, at katiyakan na pinagkalooban Niya kayo ng iba’t ibang biyaya na hindi pinagkaloob kaninuman sa inyong kapanahunan.
    21. “O aking sambayanan, pumasok kayo sa banal na kalupaan – na ito ay ang ‘Baytul Maqdis’ at ang mga nakapalibot doon, na siyang ipinangako ng Allâh sa inyo na ito ay inyong mapapasok; at makipaglaban sa sinuman na mga walang pananampalataya na naroroon at huwag kayong aatras sa pakikipaglaban sa mga taong malalakas na yaon; kung hindi ay wala kayong mapapalang kabutihan dito sa daigdig at sa kabilang buhay.”
    22. Sinabi nila: “O Mousâ (as), walang pag-aalinlangan na naroroon ang mga matatapang at malalakas na tao; na kung kaya, hindi namin kayang makipaglaban sa kanila; at kailanman ay hindi kami papasok doon hangga’t naroroon pa rin sila, at kapag umalis na sila ay saka pa lamang kami papasok.”
    23. Sinabi ng dalawang kalalakihang kabilang sa kanila na mga may takot sa Allâh na sila ay biniyayaan ng Allâh sa pamamagitan ng pagsunod sa Kanya at sa Kanyang Propeta, mula sa mga angkan ni Isrâ`îl: “Lusubin na ninyo ang mga matatapang at malalakas na tao sa pamamagitan ng pagpasok sa pintuan ng kanilang lunsod para maisagawa ninyo ang ipinag-utos, at kapag kayo ay nakapasok na sa pintuan ay matatalo na ninyo sila; at sa Allâh lamang kayo magtiwala kung kayo ay tunay na naniniwala sa Kanyang Sugo, sa anumang dala-dala niya sa inyo; at kung kayo ay sumusunod sa Kanyang batas.”
    24. Sinabi ng sambayanan ni Mousã (as): “Kailanman ay hindi kami papasok sa lunsod na yaan hangga’t nandiyan pa ang matatapang na mga tao; na kung kaya, ikaw ang pumunta at ang iyong ‘Rabb’ – at kayong dalawa ang makipaglaban; at kami ay uupo na lamang dito at di makikipaglaban.” At ito ay pagpupumilit mula sa kanila sa paglabag kay Mousâ (as).
    25. At humarap si Mousã (as) sa kanyang ‘Rabb’ na nananalangin: “O aking ‘Rabb!’ Ang kaya ko lamang ay ang aking sarili at ang aking kapatid; na kung kaya, ihiwalay Mo kami mula sa mga naghimagsik at sumuway sa Iyo.”
    26. At sinabi ng Allâh sa Kanyang Propeta na si Mousã (as): “Katiyakan, ang pagpasok sa banal na lugar ay ipagbabawal sa kanila na mga Hudyo, sa loob ng apatnapung taon; na sila ay gagala-gala sa kalupaan na walang patutunguhan. Na kung gayon, huwag kang malungkot, O Mousâ (as), sa mga taong lumabag at naghimagsik sa Aking kagustuhan.”

    Pag-aralan natin ngayon ang bawat versikilo:

    Versikulo 20 – Nalaman natin hindi lang mula sa Biblia kundi pati sa Qu’ran, na ang lahi ng mga Hudio ay pinili ng Diyos ng mabasa natin mula dito na, “pinagkalooban Niya kayo ng iba’t ibang biyaya na hindi pinagkaloob kaninuman sa inyong kapanahunan.”

    Versikulo 21 – Ang mga Hudio ay inutusan ni Allah na makipagdigmaan at kunin ang lupa mula sa mga naninirahan doon. Binalaaan Niya sila na huwag talikuran ang pakikipag-digma kundi ay paparusahan niya sila. “O aking sambayanan, pumasok kayo sa banal na kalupaan – na ito ay ang ‘Baytul Maqdis’ at ang mga nakapalibot doon, na siyang ipinangako ng Allâh sa inyo na ito ay inyong mapapasok; at makipaglaban sa sinuman na mga walang pananampalataya na naroroon at huwag kayong aatras sa pakikipaglaban sa mga taong malalakas na yaon; kung hindi ay wala kayong mapapalang kabutihan dito sa daigdig at sa kabilang buhay.”

    Versikulo 22 – Ang mga Hudio ay payapa at ayaw nilang makipagdigma subalit nais ni Allah ng digmaan at pagdanak ng dugo. Sinabi nila, “O Mousâ (as), walang pag-aalinlangan na naroroon ang mga matatapang at malalakas na tao; na kung kaya, hindi namin kayang makipaglaban sa kanila; at kailanman ay hindi kami papasok doon hangga’t naroroon pa rin sila, at kapag umalis na sila ay saka pa lamang kami papasok.”

    Versikulo 23 – Dalawa lamang sa lahat ng mga Hudio ang pumayag makipagdigmaan. Natuwa si Allah sa kanila at pinangakuan sila ng katagumpayan.

    Versikulo 24 – Patuloy na tumangging makipagdigmaan ang mga Hudio. Tinanong nila si Moises kung bakit ang kangyang Panginoon ay gusto ng digmaan. Sinabi nila na si Moises na lamang ang sumama sa kaniyang Panginoon at silaay magpapaiwan. Sinabi nila, “Kailanman ay hindi kami papasok sa lunsod na yaan hangga’t nandiyan pa ang matatapang na mga tao; na kung kaya, ikaw ang pumunta at ang iyong ‘Rabb’ – at kayong dalawa ang makipaglaban; at kami ay uupo na lamang dito at di makikipaglaban.”

    Versikulo 25 – Ang mga suwail at ang mga masunurin ay binibigysn ni Allah ng kanikanilang mga katawagan o titulo. Sabyan ninyo ako sa pagbasa. “O aking ‘Rabb!’ Ang kaya ko lamang ay ang aking sarili at ang aking kapatid; na kung kaya, ihiwalay Mo kami mula sa mga naghimagsik at sumuway sa Iyo.” Dito ay hinatulan ni Allah ang mga Hudio sa pagtanggi nilang patayin ang mga nakatira sa lupang pangako. Tinawag niya silang mga suwail na nilalang.

    Versikulo 26 – Nagalit si Allah dahil sa pagtanggi ng mga Hudio na labanan at paslangin ang mga higante. Pinarusahan niya sila ng 40 taon na paglalakbay sa disyerto.

    Panahon na upang magtanong. Tinaguriang mga higante sa Qur’an ang mga naninirahan sa Palestino. Hindi maaring ang tinutukoy dito ay ang mga Palestino ngayon dahil sila ay pandak at maliliit ang pangangatawan kung ikukumpara sa karaniwang pangangatawan.
    Sa makatuwid, sino ang mga Palestino? Saan sila nagmula? Simple lang ang sagot. Sila ang mga Muslim na kasama ni Omar Ibn El-Ka’tab na pumasok sa lupain noong 717 taon makalipas ang pagdating ni Kristo (Basahin ang “Pact of Omar.”) Si Yasser Arafat ay hindi maaaring nagmula sa lahi ng mga higante dahil wala pa sa limang talampakan ang kanyang taas.

    Bakit pinili nila ang lupain gito at tinawag itong “banal na lupain” (Qur’an 5:21), gayung wala pang propeta si Allah na nanirahan doon?

    Dineklara mismo ni Allah ang Israel na lupaing inilaan para lamang sa mga Hudio (Qur’an 5:21), kahit pa katumbas nito ay puwersahang pagkuha nito mula sa mga naninirahan doon. Ang mga Muslim sa ngayon ay nagsasabi na hindi makatuwiran, kahindikhindik, isang krimen at hindi makatao na kunin ang Israel (Palestina) mula sa mga Palestino. Mangangahas baa ng mga Muslim na sabihing ang desisyon ni Allah na ipapatay at palayasin ang mga higante mula sa Israel ay hindi makatuwiran, kahindikhindik, isang krimen at hindi makatao?

    Ang hindi makatarungan ay ang pagpaparusa ni Allah sa mga Hudio sa pamamagitan ng palalakbay nila sa disyerto ng 40 taon dahilan sa pagtanggi nilang makipagdigma laban sa mga higante. Ipinapakita na upang maging katangaptangap ang mga Hudio sa paningin ni Allah ay kailangan nila patayin ang mga higante at sakupin ang banal na lupain. Tanging sa gaoong paraan lamang magugustuhan ni Allah ang mga Hudio.
    Mga Pangaraw-araw na Sumpa para Sa Mga Hudio at Kristiyano

    Pansinin na limang beses sa isang araw kung isumpa ng mag Muslim ang mga Hudio at Kristiyano. Nilalarawan sa Qur’an 1:7 na kapwa ang mga Hudio at kristiyano ay tinaguriang mga isinumpa:

    Sa daraanan nilang mga pinagkalooban mo ng grasya, ‘di tulad nilang mga talunan (Kristiyano) o silang mga umani ng iyong poot 9Mha Hudio).

    Ang mga Hudio ngayon ay limang beses sa isang araw isinusumpa ng mga Muslimdahil sa pagtanggi nilang paslangin ang lahat nga mga higante (mga Palentino?).

    Sa isa sa mga di mabilang na debateng aking kinasangkutan, tinanong ko ang isang mangangaral na Muslimtanggap ni Allah noon na paslangin ang mga higante. Sinabi niya na hindi mga Muslim ang higante noong panahong iyon kaya’t obligasyon ng mga mananampalataya na patayin sila. Hustisya ang tawag doon sa Islam. Ang tawag ko doon ay kasinungalingan.

    Ang mga punto ng aking konklusyon ay narito:

    Bakit itong bayan para sa mga Hudyo ang piniili ni Allah? Bakit niya pinagparteparte ang bayan para sa mga Hudyo?
    Kung si Allah ang tunay na Diyos, dapat ay alam niyang isang malaking pagkakamali ang pagbibigay ng lupain sa mga Hudyo at ito’y magbubunga lamang ng malaking digmaan sa panahong ito. Ang pag-danak ng dugo na nagaganap ngayon ay sariling krimen ni Allah dahil siya ang pumili ng lupain para sa mga Hudyo. Maliwanag na hindi alam ni Allah ng mga panahong iyon na ang mga maninirahan sa Banal na Lupain pagdating ng panahon ay mga Muslim.
    Ang pangalan ng mga Palestino ay hindi nabangit ni Allah sa Qur’an. Kinapos kaya siya ng impormasyon kaya nagkaganuon?
    Ang pinakamabigat na puntong makukuha natin sa lahat ng ito ay ang Qur’an mismo ang nagbibigay ng katibayan na mali ang
    mga paratang ng mga Muslim laban sa Israel. Si Allah mismo
    ang nagwika na ang Israel ay para sa mga Hudyo.

    Bakit Tinaguriang mga Baboy at Ungoy ang mga Hudyo ni Allah

    Qur’an 2:65:

    وَلَقَدْ عَلِمْتُمُ الَّذِينَ اعْتَدَوْا مِنكُمْ فِي السَّبْتِ فَقُلْنَا لَهُمْ كُونُوا قِرَدَةً خَاسِئِينَ
    ( سورة البقرة , Al-Ba’qara, Qur’an 2:65)

    At walang pag-aalinlangan, batid ninyo ang masidhing pagkakasala ng inyong mga ninuno, noong nilabag nila ang itinakdang hangganan o kagustuhan ng Allâh bilang matinding kasamaan at paghihimagsik. Ipinagbawal sa kanila noon, dahil sa kanilang pagkakasala, ang pangingisda sa araw ng Sabado (Sabbath), gayon pa man ay naglagay pa rin sila ng lambat sa araw na yaon at nanghuli sila ng mga isda. Na kung kaya, dahil sa paglabag nila, sinabi Namin sa kanila: “Maging mga unggoy kayo, na kahamak-hamak at tinanggihan.” Kaya’t sila ay naging mga unggoy.

    Isinumpa ni Allah ang mga Hudyo dahil sa pangingisda sa araw ng Sabado na tinuturing na banal na araw ng pamamahinga, na sa aking palagay ay ikinagalit ni Allah. Ang tanong ko ay bakit sa makalipas na ilang libong taon ay walang ni isang Hudyo, lalaki man o babae ang naging anyong ungoy o baboy?

    Alalahanin na hindi kailanman pinalaya ni Allah ang mga Hudyo sa banal na araw ng Sabado. Tandaan rin na ang sumpa ay nagpapatuloy parin magpahangang ngayon. Magsama ng isang kaibigang Hudyo sa pangingisda isang Sabado at magdala ng kamera na pang-bidyo. Tingnan ninyo kung ang inyong kaibigang Hudyo ay magiging ungoy o baboy. Kung mananatili siyang tao hanga’t sa katapusan ng banal na araw, nangangahulugang walang epekto ang sumpa ni Allah.

    Kung ayaw ni Allah na gumawa ng anumang gawain ang mga Hudyo sa araw ng Sabado, bakit niya pinahihintulutan ang mga Muslim gumawa ng mga gawain buong Biyernes?

    Dahil sa pangingisda sa araw ng Sabado, ginawang mga ungoy at baboy ang mga Hudyo ni Allah. Narito ang kuwento sa Qur’an 7:163:
    At tanungin mo sila na mga Hudyo, O Muhammad, hinggil sa bayan na malapit sa tabi ng dagat, noong lumabag sila sa araw ng ‘Sabbath’ (Sabado), nilabag nila sa araw ng ‘Sabbath’ ang mga hangganang itinakda ng Allâh na Kanyang ipinagbawal, dahil inutusan sila na igalang ang araw ng Sabado (Sabbath) at huwag silang manghuhuli ng isda, subali’t sinubukan sila ng Allâh; kaya dumarating ang napakarami at malalaking isda na lumulutang sa karagatan sa araw ng Sabado, at kapag lumipas na ang araw ng Sabado ay nawawala naman ang mga ito at wala na silang nakikita (mula sa mga isda), na kung kaya, sila ay nagpakana na mahuli nila sa araw ng Sabado ang mga isda sa pamamagitan ng paglalagay nila ng lambat bago mag-Sabado at saka nila kukunin pagkatapos ng Sabado.
    Basahin natin ang interpretasyon sa Qur’an 7:163 (Inilimbag ni Ibn Kathir, 2002, Inilathala sa pamamagitan ni Dar-‘Tiba, V2, Pahina 163):

    تفسير ابن كثير
    إسماعيل بن عمر بن كثير القرشي الدمشقي المجلد الثاني ص 163
    دار طيبة
    سنة النشر: 1422هـ / 2002م
    ابن عباس، وقوله: {إذ يعدون في السبت} أي يعتدون فيه ويخالفون أمر اللّه فيه لهم بالوصاة به إذ ذاك {إذ تأتيهم حيتانهم يوم سبتهم شرعا}، قال ابن عباس: أي ظاهرة على الماء، {ويوم لا يسبتون لا تأتيهم كذلك نبلوهم} أي نختبرهم بإظهار السمك لهم على ظهر الماء في اليوم المحرم عليهم صيده، وإخفائها عنهم في اليوم الحلال لهم صيده،

    Habang ang isda ay lumalangoy sa ibabaw ng tubig tuwing araw ng banal na pamamahinga, upang makita itong palutanglutang sa ibabaw ng tubig, ayon kay Al-Dahhak, na iniulat ito mula kay Ibn `Abbas Ibn Jarir na siyang nagsabi na, “Sinabi ni Allah (ngunit sa araw maliban sa Sabado ay walang lumalabas na isad: sa ganitong paraan natin sila ipinahamak, upang sila ay magkasala) sa makatuwid, sa ganitong paraan natin sila sinubok sa pamamagitan ng paglangoy ng isda sa ibabaw ng tubig sa araw na ipinagbabawal ang pangingisda. At sa mga nalalabing araw sa loob ng isang lingo kung saan sila ay maaaring mangisda, ang isda ay mananatiling nakakubli musa sa kanila, (sa ganitong paraan natin sila ipapahamak) upang subukin sila…

    Ang di pantay na pamantayan ni Allah ay makikita sa kuwentong ito (Qur’an 2:17):

    Ipinagbawal sa inyo ni Allah ang mga karne mula sa namatay na hayop, ang dugo at ang karneng baboy, at yaong mga karne na lubusang inialay sa pangalan na maliban kay Allah. Subalit kung sino man ang napilitan dahil sa pangangailangan (kagaya ng kagutuman) hindi dala ng pagnanasa or paglampas sa kautusan ni Allah, hindi siya magkakasala: Mapagpatawad at maawain si Allah.

    Sa makatuwid, maaaring kumain ng baboy ang isang Muslim at labagin ang kautusan ni Allah ng dahil sa kanyang gutom.
    Kung gayon ay bakit hindi maawain si Allah sa mga Hudyo na hinayaan niyang magdusa sa loob ng anim na araw kada lingo at pagkatapos ay lumalabas lamang ang isda kung Sabado. Ilang lingo kayang mag-‘fast’ ng walang pagkain ang mga Hudyo? Ilang lingo kaya ng mga Hudyo mag’fast.’ Ibig sabihin, sariling pamamaraan ni Allah ang krimen at sa medaling salita kagagawan ni Allah ang krimen at pagkatapos nais niyang parusahan ang mga Hudyo sa pamamagitan ng pangingisda sa araw ng Sabado?
    Pinagbawal ni Allah na mangisda tuwing Sabado, subalit pinalilitaw lamang niya ang isda sa araw ng Sabado!
    Paano pakakainin ng mha dukhang mangingisda ang kanilang mga pamilya anim na araw sa loob ng isang lingo kung pallalanguyin lang niya ang mga isda sa taas ng dagat tuwing Sabado?
    Makatarungan ba iyon? Pinaglalaruan ni Allah ang mga Hudyo, ginugutom sila upang mapilitan silang sumuway sa kanyang kautusan; at pagkatapos ay parusahan sila sa pamamagitan ng pagpapalit ng kanilang anyo sa mga daga, baboy at ungoy!
    Maliwanag na ang gumawa ng istoryang ito ay mala-demonyo ang kaisipan, ipinapaliwanag lang sa atin na pinaparusahan tayo ni Allah para sa kaligayahang pantao lamang – ang masiyahan sa panonood na magutom ang mga bata anim na araw sa isang lingo, para lamang susugan ang pagka-bilib sa sarili.
    Maging Mga Daga ay Nagmula sa Mga Hudyo!

    Sahih Al-Bukhari, Aklat 54, Hadith 524:

    Iniulat ni Abu Huraira: Sinabi ng Propeta, “Isang grupo ng mga batang Israelita ang nawawala. Walang nakakita kung paano sila kumilos. Subalit ang alam ko sila ay isinumpa (ni Allah) at nag-anyong mga daga, dahil kapag inilagay mo sa harap ng daga ang gatas ng babaeng kamelyo, hindi ito iinom, pero kung ang ilalagay mo sa harap nito ay gatas ng babaeng tupa, iinom ito.” Ito ang sinabi ko kay Ka’eb na nagtanong, “Narinig mo ba ito mula sa Propeta?” Ang sabi ko ay, “Oo.” Paulit-ulit akong tinanong niKa’ebe tungkol duons; Sinabi ko kay Ka’eb “Nagbabasa ba ako ng Torah? (Hal. Sa Propeta ko ito narinig.)”

    Pag-aralan natin ang kaisipan ni Muhammad patungkol sa kung ano ang tanggap sa isang hayop. Ang uri ng inumin na tinatangihan ng isang hayop ay sumasagisag ng lahi na inyong pinagmulan. Pero hindi ba’t si Allah mismo ang gumawa sa kanilang mag-anyong hayop bilang parusa sa kanilang kamalian?

    Gamitin natin itong mala-henyong kaisipan ni Muhammad para pag-aralan ang isang misteryo:

    Ang mga buriko ay hindi umiinom ng “whiskey” o alalak, at ang mga Muslim ay hindi umiinom ng alak. Samakatuwid, ang mga buriko ay dating mga Muslim at ginawa lamang silang buriko ni Allah?

    Tandaan na hindi ko tinatawag na buriko ang mga Muslim, sigurado ‘yan, ginagaya ko lang ang katalinuhan ni Muhammad sa paggamit ng ganitong kaisipan. Tutal hindi ba’t siya ang pinakamagaling na halimbawa na dapat sundin?

    Ang tanong ko ay kung saan nakiha ni Mohammad ang ganitong ideya? Hindi maalis sa isipan ni Muhammad ang mga Hudyo. Maging sa mga utos niya sa mga Muslim, hindi niya ginamit na batayan ang katuruan ni Allah o sa kung alin ang tama o mali, kundi kung ano ang kabaligtaran ng mga ginagawa ng mga Hudyo, katulad ng makikita natin sa mga hadith. Ito ang ilang mga halimbawa.

    Lumikha nga mga Batayan si Muhammad, Hindi Mula sa katuruan ni Allah, Subalit Upang Kalabanin ang mga Hudyo.

    Sunan Abu-Dawood, Ika-2 Aklat, Hadith 0652:

    Iniulat Aws ibn ‘Thabit al-Ansari: “Sinabi ng mga mensahero ni Allah: ‘Kumilos kayo nga kaiba sa mga Hudyo, sa ngalan nila huwag kayong mananalangin na suot ang mga sandalyas at sapatos.’”

    Hindi ba kaya ni Muhammad na sabihan sila kung paano manalangin ng hindi inaalala kung ano ang mga ginagawa ng mga Hudyo? Bakit kailangang ang lahat nga ginagawa ng mga Muslim ay kabaligtaran ng sa mga Hudyo? Higit na mas katawatawa ang mga simusunod sa hadith (Sunan Abu-Dawood, Ika-20 Aklat, Hadith 3170):

    Ulat ni ‘Ubadah Ibn Assamet: “Ang mensahero ni Allah ay nananatiling nakatayo sa lamay hangang hindi naililibing ang bangkay sa hukay. Isang Hudyo na may mataas na napag-aralan ang dumaan sa kanya (Muhammad) habang siya ay nakatayo sa harapan ng isang hukay habang may inililibing at matapos nuon ay sinabi ng Hudyo na: ‘Ganito natin ito ginagawa (sa madaling salita ay nananalangin ng naka-tayo).’ Naupo ang propeta at sinabi niyang: “Maupo kayo at umakto ng iba sa kanila (mga Hudyo).”

    Totoo ba ito? Ng sabihin ng isang Hudyo na ganito namin gawin ito, saka lamang niya binago at ginawa ang kabaligtaran nuon?
    Ang ibig ba sabihin ay nagkamali si Muhammad sa lahat ng panahong nanalangin siya ng naka-tayo sa harap ng libingan?
    Bakit hindi hiniling ni Muhammad na turuan siya ni Allah kung paano ang tamang paraan ng pananalangin imbis na umarte siyang parang bata “Sinabi ng Propeta na: ‘Maupo kayo at ibahin ang inyong kilos sa kanila.”

    Matatagpuan ang isa pang halimbawa sa Sahih Al-Bukhari. Ika-56 Aklat, Hadith 668:

    It reported by Abu Huraira: Allah’s messenger said, “The Jews and the Christians do not dye their gray hair, as a result you shall do the opposite of what they do (which means dye your gray hair and beards).”

    Malinaw na ang Islam ay sadyang ginawa upang maging kabaligtaran ng lahat ng pinaniniwalaan ng Kristyanismo at ‘Judaism.’ Ang resulta, kung may Muslim na lalapit sa iyo at sasabihing, “An gating diyos ay magkatulad,” niloloko ka niya. Alam niyang anuman ang ating paniwalaan at gawin, ang bawat gawain at kautusan ay baligtarin ng kanyang propeta, hindi dahil sa mali tayo, kundi para lang maging kabaligtaran sa atin

    Usapang Pangkapayapaan sa Islam

    Hindi ko alam kung naiintindihan ninyo kung gaano kadelikado ang Islam. Nakita na ninyo, kinamumuhiaan ni Allah ang lahat ng mga Kristiyano at inuutusan ang mga Muslim na labanan sila. May humigit kumulang na tatlong bilyong mamamayan na Kristiyano ang kailangan labanan ng mga Muslim. Ang pagapipilian lamang ay ang magpasakop,

  • Gisado Question 4 Kung mali ang aral naming mga katoliko sa tingin nyo ba

    Gisado Question 4 Kung mali ang aral naming mga katoliko sa tingin nyo ba

    What bible said about Muhammad

    1 John 4:1New King James Version (NKJV)

    4 Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world.

    Allah will make better Qur’an next week?

    Qur’an 2:106

    to top
    2:106
    Sahih International

    We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten except that We bring forth [one] better than it or similar to it. Do you not know that Allah is over all things competent?

    But Allah said he will never change his Qur’an ?

    6:115

    to top
    6:115
    Dr. Ghali

    And perfected is the Word of your Lord in sincerity and justice; nothing whatever can exchange His Words; and He is the Ever-Hearer, The Ever-Knowing.

    But wait Allah will change the Qur’an ?

    Qur’an 16:101

    to top
    16:101
    Sahih International

    And when We substitute a verse in place of a verse – and Allah is most knowing of what He sends down – they say, “You, [O Muhammad], are but an inventor [of lies].” But most of them do not know.

    The bible is changed but 300 before Mahammad as Muslims claim but yet the Qur’an  confirm what Christians have between their hands in the time of Muhammad? 600 years after Christ!!!

    Qur’an 3:3

    to top
    3:3
    Dr. Ghali

    He has been sending down upon you the Book with the Truth, sincerely (verifying) what was before it (Literally: between its two hands), and He sent down the Tawrah (The Book revealed to Musa “Moses”) and the Injil. (The Book revealed to Isa).

  • Gay and Lesbian Justice in the Qur’an Eng/ Filipino Hustisya sa Bakla at Tomboy ayon sa Qur’an

    Gay and Lesbian Justice in the Qur’an Eng/ Filipino Hustisya sa Bakla at Tomboy ayon sa Qur’an

    Gay and Lesbian Justice in the Qur’an
    Hustisya sa Bakla at Tomboy ayon sa Qur’an

    Lesbian Punishment in the Qur’an.
    Parusa sa mga Tomboy ayon sa Qur’an

    سورة النساء , An-Nisa, Qur’an 4:15:
    .
    Para sa mga kababaihang tomboy, magdala ng apat na saksi upang tumestigo laban sa kanila. Pagkatapos ay ikulong ang mga ito sa kanilang mga bahay hanggang sila ay mamatay at makita ang Kaniyang mga paraan.

    If women are lesbians, the punishment is jailing them until they die. Is the punishment for gay men the same?
    Kung ang babae ay tomboy, ang kaparusahan ay pagkakakulong hanggang sa siya ay mamatay. Katulad din ba nito ang kaparusahan sa mga lalaking bakla?

    Punishment of Gay men in Qur’an
    Parusa sa mga Lalaking Bakla ayon sa Qur’an

    سورة النساء , An-Nisa, Qur’an 4:16:

    If two of your men among you are guilty of homosexuality, punish them both. If they both repent, leave them alone, for Allah is accepting of repentance, Most Merciful.
    Kung dalawa sa inyong mga kalalakihan ay bakla, pareho silang parusahan. Kung sila naman ay parehong magsisi, pabayaan na sila, sapagkat si Allah ay tumatanggap ng pagsisisi, Ang Pinaka-maawain.

    What we notice in here is:
    Mapapansin natin dito na:

    1. Gay men will not be jailed.
    Hindi ikukulong ang mga lalaking bakla.
    2. They have the chance to repent.
    Sila ay may pagkakataong magsisi.
    3. Punishment is easy for them, even if they do not repent (beating them with sandals) as we see in Ibn ‘Abbas interpretation of Qur’an 4:16:
    Magaan ang kaparusahan sa kanila at kahit na hindi sila magsisi (papaluin ng sandalyas) na makikita sa paliwanag sa Ibn ‘Abbas ng Qur’an 4:16:
    Punish both of them, with insults and beatings with sandals; but if they repent of this, leave them alone.
    Pareho silang parusahan sa pamamagitan ng mga insulto at pagmamalo ng sandalyas; ngunit kung sila ay magsisi, pabayaan na sila.

    Gay Men
    Lalaking Bakla
    Lesbian Women
    Babaeng Tomboy
    Beating with sandals
    Pamamalo ng sandalyas
    Beating is part of beating the wife in Islam (Qur’an 4:34)
    Ang pamamalo ay bahagi ng pamamalo sa maybahay sa Islam (Qur’an 4:34)
    They can repent
    Maaari silang magsisisi
    No repentance
    Walang pagkakataong magsisi
    If they repent leave them alone (no more insult)
    Kung sila’y magsisi, sila’y maaari nang pabayaan (hindi na iinsultuhin)
    They will be jailed until they die
    Sila ay makukulong hanggang sila ay mamatay

    Is that really a rule of a god? If Allah views this as a crime, shouldn’t it be the same for a man with a man and a woman with a woman? Why is the punishment totally different; very harsh for women and so easy to men?
    Ganito ba talaga ang panuntunan ng isang diyos? Kung ang pagtingin ni Allah dito ay isang pagkakasala, hindi ba’t ang paglabag ay pareho lamang ito ba ay sa lalaking bakla o sa babaeng tomboy man? Bakit ang kaparusahan ay magkaiba – napakalupit para sa mga kababaihan ngunit napakagaan para sa mga kalalakihan?

    Some Muslims will say to you, “Oh, this verse was abrogated later.” It does not matter if your god keeps changing his mind. This is not the issue. God is about justice, but this god is not fair at all.
    Sinasabi ng ilang mga Muslim, “Ah, pinawalang bisa na yan kinalaunan.” Hindi ba mahalaga kung ang diyos mo ay pabago-bago ng isip. Ang Diyos ay makatarungan ngunit ang diyos na ito ay hindi patas.

    Why did Allah abrogate this verse?
    Did he find himself so wrong that he repented?
    Bakit pinawalang bisa ito ni Allah?
    Napagtanto niya bang siya’y nagkamali at ito’y binawi?

    A Muslim Cannot Take Even His Own Family as Friends
    Hindi maaring kaibiganin ng isang Muslim maging ang sarili niyang pamilya

    If someone converts to Islam, he has no choice but to hate his own family and he cannot have them as friends as long they are from the non-believers (non-Muslims) (Qur’an 9:23):
    Kung ang isang tao ay sumampalataya sa Islam, wala siyang pagpipilian kundi talikuran ang kaniyang sariling pamilya at hindi niya sila maaaring gawing kaibigan hanggat sila ay hindi mananampalataya (hindi Muslim) (Qur’an 9:23)

    O you who believe! Take not your fathers nor your brethren as friends or protectors if they obtain happiness in disbelief rather than believe [Islam]. Those of you who take them for friends, they should blame no one but themselves.
    O ikaw na naniniwala! Huwag mong kaibiganin o gawing tagapagtanggol ang iyong ama o maging ang iyong mga kapatid kung sila ay maligaya sa kawalang-paniwala sa halip na maniwala (sa Islam). Kayo na kinakaibigan sila, wala kayong ibang dapat na sisihin kundi ang inyong mga sarili.

    A Muslim cannot give you a speech that his god means the enemy, when he speaks about not taking them as friends, because it’s so clear, that your father and mother, brothers, or sisters love you, even if they reject your faith.
    Hindi maaaring sabihin sa’yo ng isang Muslim na ang ibig sabihin ng kanilang diyos ay ang kaaway nang sabihin niya na huwag silang kaibiganin, dahil napakalinaw na mahal ka ng iyong ama, ina, at mga kapatid kahit na ayawan nila ang iyong pananampalataya.
    Therefore, why can’t they even be just friends?
    Kung ganoon, bakit hindi pwede kahit sila’y maging mag-kaibigan man lang?
    Note here there is no condition saying if they are bad, take them not as friends. It’s an order for all Muslims to practice such a thing if they have such of a case.
    Pansinin na hindi sinasabi dito na kung sila ay masama, huwag silang kaibiganin. Ito ay isang utos na kailangang sundin ng mga Muslim kung sila ay nasa ganitong kalagayan.

    Does Allah Love You as a Christian?
    Mahal ka ba ni Allah bilang isang Kristiyano?

    I always hear Muslims saying that Islam does not hate Christians. They quote to you verses which have been abrogated. Abrogate means to abolish by formal or official means; annul by an authoritative act; repeal, to abrogate a law. With Islam, it’s still in the Qur’an, but Muslims cannot follow it anymore.
    Madalas kong marinig sa mga Muslim na hindi galit ang Islam sa mga Kristiyano. Bibigyan ka nila ng mga talatang abrogated na. Ang kahulugan ng abrogated ay inalis na sa pamamagitan ng pormal o opisyal na pamamaraan; pinawalang bisa na sa pamamagitan ng isang makapangyarihang batas. Sa Islam, nakasulat pa rin ito sa Qur’an ngunit hindi na maaaring sundin ng mga Muslims.

    Let’s see how much Allah is in love with the Christians. Let me show you in Qur’an 5:51; Allah is saying:
    Tingnan natin kung gaano kamahal ni Allah ang mga Kristiyano. Sa Qur’an 5:51, sinabi ni Allah:

    Take not Christian and Jew as friends and protectors; they are friends to each other, and if any of you take them as friends, he is one of them and unjust to himself (which means he is out of Islam and he will be punished by death).
    Huwag mong kaibiganin o gawing tagapagtanggol ang Kristiyano at Hudyo, sila ay magkaibigan, at kung sino man ang kumaibigan sa kanila, siya ay kabilang na sa kanila at lumabag sa katuwiran (ibig sabihin siya ay inalis na sa Islam at paparusahan ng kamatayan)

    Then this is this command in Qur’an 9:29:
    At ito ang kautusan sa Qur’an 9:29:

    Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Judgment Day, nor forbid what Allah and His Messenger order to be forbidden, nor accept the religion of truth (Islam), of the People of the Book (Christian and Jew), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves humiliated and subdued.
    Labanan ang hindi naniniwala kay Allah o sa Araw ng Paghuhukom, o ang hindi nagbabawal sa mga ipinagbabawal ni Allah at ng Kanyang Mensahero, o hindi tinatanggap ang relihiyong ng katotohanan (Islam), and mga Tao ng Aklat (Kristiyano at Hudyo), hanggang pagbayaran nila ang Jizyah ng may maluwag na pagsunod, at maramdaman nilang sila ay napahiya at nagpasakop na.

    I explained how Muslims have to fight us until we either convert to Islam, or pay them monthly fees to stay alive, and that we have to pay it with humiliation, like dogs.
    Ipinaliwanag ko kung paanong kailangang labanan tayo ng mga Muslim hanggang sa tayo ay sumampalataya sa Islam o kaya ay magbayad ng buwanang bayarin katumbas n gating buhay, at kailangan pagbayaran natin ito ng may pagkapahiya katulad ng mga aso.

    Allah shows his amazing love to the Christians in this next verse! I hope every Christian will remember it forever. You need clear proof that Islam hates Christians, and this is one of the best verses to prove that point, if you want to expose Islam. Qur’an 5:14:
    Tingnan natin ang kagulat-gulat na pagmamahal ni Allah sa mga Kristiyano dito sa susunod na talata! Sana ay palaging pakatandaan ito ng mga Kristiyano. Kailangan natin ng malinaw na patunay na galit ang Islam sa Kristiyano at isa ang talatang ito sa magpapatibay nito kung nais mong ilantad ang Islam. Qur’an 5:14:

    From those, who call themselves Christians, We did take a covenant, but they forgot part of scriptures that We (Allah) sent to them: therefore We estranged them, with enmity and hatred between the one and the other, until the Judgment day. Soon Allah will show them what it is they were doing.
    Para sa mga tinatawag ang kanilang sarili na mga Kristiyano, kami nga ay nakipagtipan sa kanila, ngunit kanilang kinalimutan ang bahagi ng kasulatang nagsasabi na Kami (Allah) ay isinugo sila: sa gayon amin silang hiniwalay ng may poot at pagkamuhi laban sa kanila, hanggang dumating ang araw ng Paghuhukom. Sa madaling panahon ipapakita ni Allah ang mga mali nilang ginagawa.

    وَمِنَ الَّذِينَ قَالُوا إِنَّا نَصَارَىٰ أَخَذْنَا مِيثَاقَهُمْ فَنَسُوا حَظًّا مِّمَّا ذُكِّرُوا بِهِ فَأَغْرَيْنَا بَيْنَهُمُ الْعَدَاوَةَ وَالْبَغْضَاءَ إِلَىٰ يَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ ۚ وَسَوْفَ يُنَبِّئُهُمُ اللَّهُ بِمَا كَانُوا يَصْنَعُونَ

    In Qur’an 5:14, Allah has a plan for you as a Christian. The plan is so clear that Allah will fuel us with hate and enmity between Christians (estranged them, with enmity and hatred).
    Ayon sa Qur’an 5:14, si Allah ay may plano para sa iyo bilang Kristiyano. Napakalinaw ng plano ni Allah na lalo pang pagalabin ang poot at pagkamuhi laban sa mga Kristiyano. (hiniwalay ng may poot at pagkamuhi).

    Let us study this plan of war; Allah’s war on Christians
    Pag-aralan natin itong planong labanan; Pakikidigma ni Allah sa mga Kristiyano

    1. Allah will not make us hate the Muslims (Christians do not hate Muslims).
    Hindi gagawing galit ni Allah ang mga Kristiyano sa mga Muslims (Hindi galit ang Kristiyano sa mga Muslim).
    2. Allah will make us hate and fight each other as Christians! Allah has been so successful for a long time in this war, and many Christians are following the plan of Allah. We see Christians attacking each other’s churches, but they will never open their lips against Islam.
    Ginagawa ni Allah na magaway-away at magalit ang mga Kristiyano sa isa’t-isa. Sa mahaba nang panahon, matagumpay si Allah sa hidwaang ito at maraming mga Kristiyano ang sumusunod sa plano ni Allah. Makikita natin ito sa mga pagkakataong nililibak ng mga Kristiyano ang kani-kanilang mga simbahan ngunit walang imik laban sa Islam.

    What I am trying to say is that it’s the plan of Satan to prevent us from uniting as Christians (Orthodox, Protestant, and Catholic). IT IS Allah’s plan and he is saying it in clear words, “I will divide you and make you hate each other, so that I will make the Church of Jesus a divided kingdom.”
    Pinupunto ko lamang na plano ni Satanas na pigilan tayo na mga Kristiyano na magkaisa (Orthodox, Protestant, and Catholic). Plano ito ni Allah at malinaw ito sa mga katagang “Pagbabahabahagiin ko kayo at gagawin kong kamuhian ninyo ang isa’t isa at nang sa gayon ang Iglesia ni Hesus ay isang kaharian na bahabahagi.

    Remember, Christ said in Matthew 12:25 (KJV):
    Alalahanin na sanabi ni Kristo sa Mateo 12:25:

    And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:
    At pagkaalam niya ng mga iniisip nila, ay sinabi niya sa kanila, Ang bawat kahariang nagkakabahabahagi laban sa kaniya sarili ay mawawasak; ang bawat bayan o bahay na nagkakabahabahagi laban sa kaniyang sarili ay hindi mananatili:

    It’s painful to see Christians speaking evilly against each other, but when you ask these priests or these ministers about Islam, they do not dare say one word! It’s the plan of Allah, the Anti-Christ, to divide us. Whoever he helps in that direction is working for Allah. Read this verse again, carefully, and tell me if I am wrong.
    Masakit makita ang mga Kristiyanong nagsasalita ng masama laban sa isa’t isa, ngunit kung tatanungin mo ang isang pari o ministro tungkol sa Islam, di man lamang sila mangangahas kahit isa man lamang salita! Plano ni Allah, ng Anti-Christ, na tayo ay bahabahagiin. Kung sinuman ang tumutulong na mangyari ito ay nagtatrabaho para kay Allah. Muling basahin ang talatang ito ng dahan-dahan, at sabihin mo kung mali ako.

    Qur’an 5:14:

    As for those who call themselves Christians, We did take a pledge, but they forgot a good part of scriptures that we sent to them. Therefore, We (Allah) estranged them, with animosity and hatred between the one and the other, until the Judgment day. And soon will Allah show them what it is they were doing.
    Para sa mga tinatawag ang kanilang sarili na mga Kristiyano, kami nga ay nakipagtipan sa kanila, ngunit kanilang kinalimutan ang bahagi ng kasulatang nagsasabi na Kami (Allah) ay isinugo sila: sa gayon amin silang hiniwalay ng may poot at pagkamuhi laban sa kanila, hanggang dumating ang araw ng Paghuhukom. Sa madaling panahon ipapakita ni Allah ang mga mali nilang ginagawa.

    We should be believers and followers of Christ! Not a man. Not a bishop. Not a minister. No name, but His name! Why should we follow the sinners? See Romans 3:23 (KJV):
    Tayo ay mananampalataya at tagasunod ni Kristo! Hindi ng tao. Hindi ng obispo. Hindi ng ministro. Walang ibang pangalan kundi ang pangalan lamang Niya! Bakit tayo susunod sa mga makasalanan? Tingnan ang Roma 3:23:

    For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
    Sapagkat ang lahat ay nagkasala, at walang simumang nakaabot sa kaluwalhatian ng Diyos;

    Unity with Christ is the way to his kingdom. This is what Islam fears; all of us being the good fruit of Jesus the Christ. See Romans 3:28:
    Ang pagkakaisa kay Kristo ang daan sa Kanyang kaharian. Ito ang kinatatakutan ng Islam: lahat tayo ay mabuting bunga ni Hesukristo. Tingnan ang Roma 3:28:

    Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
    Kung gayon, maliwanag na sa pamamagitan ng pananampalataya mapapawalang-sala ang tao, at hindi sa pamamagitan ng pagtupad sa kautusan.

    When Jesus comes, he will not ask you the name of your church, but for the fruit. Without the good fruit, there is hypocrisy. This is why Jesus said (Matthew 7:16):
    Pagbalik ni Hesus, hindi niya tatanungin ang pangalan ng iyong simbahan kundi ang bunga. Kung walang mabuting bunga, ito ay isang pagkukunwari. Ito ang dahilan kung bakit sinabi ni Hesus (Mateo 7:16):

    Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
    Sa kanilang mga bunga ay inyong mangakikilala sila. Nakapuputi baga ng mga ubas sa mga tinikan, o ng mga igos sa mga dawagan?

    Also see Galatians 5:22-23:
    Tingnan din ang Mga Taga-Galacia 5:22-23:

    But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law.
    Datapuwa’t ang bunga ng Espiritu ay pag-ibig, katuwaan, kapayapaan, pagpapahinuhod, kagandahang-loob, kabutihan, pagtatapat, kaamuan, pagpipigil; laban sa mga gayong bagay ay walang kautusan.

    This is how we know Islam is false and from Satan. From their fruits, not only words. Most of them are liars in word. They speak skillfully, but show me your fruit and I will tell you who you are.
    Dahil dito ay napapatunayan natin na ang Islam ay isang kasinungalingan at galling kay Satanas. Base na sa kanilang mga bunga at hindi lamang ng mga salita. Karamihan sa kanila ay mga sinungaling. Mahusay silang magsalita ngunit kung titingnan na ang kanilang bunga ay makikilala mo na sila.

    What I am trying to say to all who consider themselves Christian, whether Protestant, Catholic or Orthodox, do not divide the Church of Christ, for all of us are one in Him. As you see, Allah is targeting all of us, not a named church. We make Christ sad when we are not united. Do not let leaders, for their own glory, make us and turn us to something far from what Christ wants us to be. If you adhere to the plan of Allah, are you working for him?! It’s a good question, to which you know the answer. See 1 Corinthians 12:13 (KJV):
    Ang nais kong saibihin sa lahat ng mga Kristiyano, siya man ay isang Protestante, Katoliko, o Orthodox, huwag nating bahabahagiin ang Iglesia ni Hesus, dahil lahat tayo ay isa sa Kanya. Makikita natin na target tayong lahat ni Allah at hindi lang ng isang simbahan. Nalulungkot si Hesus kapag tayo ay hindi nagkakaisa. Huwag nating hayaan na itaas ng mga namumuno ang kanilang mga sarili at hayaan tayong talikuran ang nais ni Hesus para sa atin. Kung umaayon ka sa plano ni Allah, ikaw ba ay tagasunod niya? Isa itong magandang katanungan na alam mo naman ang kasagutan. Tingnan ang 1 Mga Taga-Corinto 12:13:

    For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
    Sapagkat sa isang Espiritu ay binabautismuhan tayong lahat sa isang katawan, maging tayo’y Judio o Griego, maging mga alipin o mga laya; at tayong lahat ay pinainom sa isang Espiritu.

    Allah and the Jews; How Much Does Allah Hate Them?
    Si Allah at ang mga Hudyo; Gaano Sila Kinamumuhian ni Allah?

    Sahih Muslim, Book 41, Hadith 6981:

    Messenger of Allah said: “You will be in fighting with the Jews, and you will murder them until even a rock would say: ‘Move towards here, Muslim, there is a Jew, he is hiding himself behind me, come and slaughter him.’”
    Sinabi ng mensahero ni Allah: “Magiging kaaway mo ang mga Hudyo, at papatayin mo sila hangga’t kahit sa ang bato ay magsasabi nang: ‘Pumunta ka dito, Muslim, may isang Hudyo, nagtatago siya sa likuran ko, at siya’y patayin mo.’”

    Sahih Muslim Book 41, Hadith 6985:

    Messenger of Allah said: “The judgment hour would not come until the Muslims fight against the Jews, and the Muslims would kill them all, and if a Jew hides behind a stone or a tree and the stone or the tree would shout saying: ‘Oh Muslim, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him;’ but the tree called Gharqaad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews!”
    Sinabi ng mensahero ni Allah: “Ang oras ng paghuhukom ay hindi darating hangga’t hindi nakikipag-away ang mga Muslim laban sa mga Hudyo, at papatayin silang lahat ng mga Muslim, at kung ang isang Hudyo ay magtago sa isang bato o puno, ang bato o punong ito ay sisigaw na nagsasabing: “O Muslim, may isang Hudyo sa likuran ko; halika at patayin mo siya;’ ngunit ang punong ito na tinatawag na Gharqaad ay hindi ito sasabihin dahil iyon ay puno ng mga Hudyo!”

    Even the rocks (the Muslim’s rocks) will report the Jewish men, women and children if they try to hide, so that the Muslims will do their duty and kill them all. And note here, there is a Jewish tree!
    Kahit na ang mga bato (bato ng mga Muslim) ay isusumbong ang mga lalake, babae, at batang Hudyo kung sila man ay magtago upang magawa ng mga Muslim ang kanilang tungkulin at silang lahat at patayin. Pansinin din na may puno ng Hudyo dito!

    Islam and Israel
    Islam at Israel

    One of the most famous conflicts in the world today is the so-called Israeli-Palestinian conflict. For most of us, all we know is that Israel is fighting with the Arab world over the land. This is true, but it is not the whole story. Most of those who debate about the conflict talk from a political point of view, and as a result try to find political solutions. Our world leaders show their ignorance by ignoring the fact that the conflict is beyond political. In fact, there is no solution for it except war, and only war. I’m not saying that I would love for a war to break out. I am simply stating a fact. Let’s look at the following hadiths.
    Isa sa mga kilalang hidwaan sa mundo ngayon ay ang tinatawag na Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Karamihan sa atin, ang alam lamang natin ay nakikipagdigma ang Israel laban sa mga Arabo dahil sa lupa. May katotohan iyon, ngunit hindi ito ang buong kwento. Marami sa mga nakikipag-debate tungkol sa hidwaan ito ay nagsasalita lamang galing sa pampulitikong pananaw, kaya pampulitikong solusyon din ang hinahanap nila. Nagpapatunay lamang ito na an gating mga pinuno ay mangmang sa mas malaki pang isyu kaysa sa pampapulitiko. Sa katotohan, walang ibang solusyon kung hindi digmaan lamang talaga. Hindi ko sinasabing gusto ko na magkaroon ng giyera. Nagsasabi lamang ako ng katotohanan. Tingnan natin ang mga sumusunod na hadiths.

    Sahih Muslim, Book 41, Hadith 6981:

    The Messenger of Allah said, “You will be in fighting with the Jews, and you will slaughter them until even a rock will say, ‘Move towards here, Muslim. There is a Jew hiding himself behind me. Come and slaughter him.’”
    Sinabi ng mensahero ni Allah: “Magiging kaaway mo ang mga Hudyo, at papatayin mo sila hangga’t kahit sa ang bato ay magsasabi nang: ‘Pumunta ka dito, Muslim, may isang Hudyo, nagtatago siya sa likuran ko, at siya’y patayin mo.’”

    Sahih Muslim, Book 41, Hadith 6985:

    The Messenger of Allah said, ”The judgment hour will not approach until the Muslims fight against the Jews and the Muslims will slaughter them all, and if a Jew hides behind a rock or a tree, the rock or tree will scream saying, ‘Oh Muslim, over here is a Jew behind me. Come and kill him,’ but the tree called Gharqaad will not say, seeing that it is the tree of the Jews!”
    Sinabi ng mensahero ni Allah: “Ang oras ng paghuhukom ay hindi darating hangga’t hindi nakikipag-away ang mga Muslim laban sa mga Hudyo, at papatayin silang lahat ng mga Muslim, at kung ang isang Hudyo ay magtago sa isang bato o puno, ang bato o punong ito ay sisigaw na nagsasabing: “O Muslim, may isang Hudyo sa likuran ko; halika at patayin mo siya;’ ngunit ang punong ito na tinatawag na Gharqaad ay hindi ito sasabihin dahil iyon ay puno ng mga Hudyo!”

    According to Muhammad, even rocks will betray all Jews—men, women, and children—who will hide behind them to make sure that no Jew will survive the slaughter. Muhammad doesn’t call for mercy. He calls for complete elimination of Jews. Knowing this, how are we supposed to be convinced that Muslims are willing to look for a peaceful solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? This is something that will happen, and no one has ever been able to stop it from the time of Muhammad until the Day of Judgment.
    Ayon kay Muhammad, maging ang mga bato ay itatatwa ang mga Hudyo – lalaki, babae, at mga kabataan – sino mang magtago sa likuran nila upang hindi mapatay. Hindi nanghihimok na awa si Muhammad. Nanawagan siya sa tuluyang burahin ang lahi ng mga Hudyo. Ngayong alam natin ito, paano tayo maniniwalang nais ng mga Muslim ng mapayapang solusyon sa Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Ito ay isang bagay na tiyak na mangyayari at walang sinuman ang nakapigil nito simula pa noong panahon ni Muhammad hanggang sa Araw ng Paghuhukom.

    Muhammad always based his religion on hate. It’s the fuel of Islam. He tried to take the side of the Jews against the Christians with the hope that the Jews would like him for it. When that did not work, he tried to make himself look like a friend to the Christians by attacking the Jews, this time hoping to win the Christians.
    Palaging nakabase sa galit ang relihiyon ni Muhammad. Ito ang tumutulak sa pagalab ng Islam. Sinubuka niyang makuha ang panig ng mga Hudyo laban sa mga Kristiyano sa pag-aakalang magugustuhan siya ng mga Hudyo dahil dito. Nang pumalya ito, sinubukan niyan ipinta ang sarili niya na kaibigan ng mga Kristiyano sa pamamagitan naman ng paninira sa mga Hudyo upang makuha ang panig ng mga Kristiyano.

    In Qur’an 5:82:

    You will find that the most ones who hate you are the Jewish and those who take associates with Allah, as well as the kindest people to Muslims are the ones who call themselves Christians.
    Makikita ninyo na karamihan ng mga galit sa inyo ay mga Hudyo at silang mga pumapanig kay Allah, at siya pang pinakamamabait sa mga Muslin ay ang mga Kristiyano.

    ( سورة المائدة , Al-Maeda, 5:82)
    لَتَجِدَنَّ أَشَدَّ النَّاسِ عَدَاوَةً لِّلَّذِينَ آمَنُوا الْيَهُودَ وَالَّذِينَ أَشْرَكُوا وَلَتَجِدَنَّ أَقْرَبَهُم مَّوَدَّةً لِّلَّذِينَ آمَنُوا الَّذِينَ قَالُوا إِنَّا نَصَارَىٰ

    Muhammad uses the so-called revelations from Allah to drive his political agenda. It shows how he switches sides whenever he feels like it, and Allah switches sides along with him. See Qur’an 2:62:
    Ginagamit ni Muhammad ang tinatawag na mga pahayag mula kay Allah upang iusad ang kanyang mga pampulitikong layunin. Pinapakita nito kung paano palipat-lipat siya ng kinakampihan kung kalian niya gusto, at si Allah ay palipat-lipat din kagaya niya. Tingnan ang Qur’an 2:62:

    Those who believe and the Jews in addition to Christians, who do good have no worry. Allah will give them their prize, and they will not have misery or sadness.
    Silang mga naniniwala at mga Hudyo kasama nga Kristiyano, na gumagawa ng mabuti aya walang dapat ipangamba. Bibigyan sila ni Allah ng premyo, at hindi na sila makakaranas ng pagaalala at kalungkutan.

    Now in Qur’an 2:62, both the Jews and the Christians are good. They will even go to heaven
    Ngayon sa Qur’an 2:62, sinsabi na parehong mabait ang mga Hudyo at Kristiyano. Sila ay makakapunta ng langit.

    Muhammad’s Stages of Taking Down his Enemy
    Mga Yugto ni Muhammad ng Pagpapabagsak sa Kanyang Kaaway

    I. Muhammad, the Man of Peace
    I. Muhammad, Ang Tao ng Kapayapaan

    At this stage, Muhammad was nothing. He had no power, no army, and no followers. In the first thirteen years of his prophet-hood, he only had 70 followers. He had no choice, but to remain a peaceful man.
    Most of the people who became his followers later were slaves as narrated by ‘Ammar bin Yasir in the following Hadith. (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 58, Hadith 197):
    Sa yugtong ito, hindi pa kilala si Muhammad. Wala pa siyang kapangyarihan, walang hukbo, at walang tagasunod. Sa unang labingtatlong taon niya sa kanyang pagiging propeta, mayroon lamang siyang pitumpong tagasunod. Wala siyang magawa kung hindi ang magiging mapayapang tao. Halos lahat ng nagging tagasunod niya kinalaunan ay mga alipin kagaya ng isinalaysay ni ‘Ammar bin Yasir sa sumusunod na Hadith (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 58, Hadith 197):

    I saw the Messenger of Allah, and accompanying him were the only ones who converted to Islam, five slaves, two women, and Abu Bakr.
    Nakita ko ang Mensahero ni Allah, at kasama niya ay yaon lamang mga nanampalatay sa Islam, limang alipin, dalawang asawa, at si Abu Bakr.

    Notice that his five followers were still called slaves even after they accepted Islam. Muhammad still considered his brothers in faith as his slaves.
    Pansinin na iyong limang tagasunod ay tinawag pa ding mga alipin kahit sila ay tinanggap na ang Islam. Itinuturing pa ding alipin ni Muhammad kahit iyong mga kapatid na niya na sa pananampalataya.

    For sure, the slaves had no choice but to convert to Islam. In the beginning, Muhammad manipulated the slaves into becoming Muslims and fighting for him by promising them freedom afterwards. This is what happened to the poor man, Bilal, who converted to Islam and fought for Muhammad, but was never granted his freedom.
    Tiyak ang mga aliping ito ay walang ibang pagpipilian kung hindi ang sumampalatay sa Islam. Sa simula, minanipula ni Muhammad ang mga alipin na maging mga Muslim at lumaban para sa kanya kapalit ng kanilang kalayaan pagkatapos. Ito ang nangyari sa kawawang lalaki na si Bilal, na umanib sa Islam at nakipaglaban para kay Muhammad ngunit hindi kailanman pinagkalooban ng kalayaan.

    II. The Hijra Stage (Immigration)
    II Ang Yugto ng Hijra (Pandarayuhan)

    This stage is exactly what Muslims practice today.
    Ang yugtong ito ay ginagawa mismo ng mga Muslim sa ngayon.

    To get ready for a big war in someone else’s land, they gather themselves in that land to plan and prepare for the attack until their population is big enough to establish an army. This is what Osama bin Laden and Al-Qa’ida did when they went to Afghanistan. They immigrated there to get ready for the big attack, and when they were ready, they attacked without mercy—exactly as Muhammad did in his time. At this stage, Muslims get their income from thievery.
    Upang maghanda para sa isang malaking digmaan sa banyagang lupain, sila ay nagtipon-tipon sa nasabing lupain at naghahanda sa paglusob hanggang ang kanilang populasyon ay dumami at makapagtatag ng isang hukbo. Ito ang ginawa ni Osama bin Laden at Al-Qa’ida nang sila ay nagpunta ng Afghanistan. Dumayo at nanirahan sila roon upang maghanda para sa isang malakihang pagsalakay, at nang sila’y nagging handa na, lumusob nga sila nang wala awa – kagaya nga ng sinabi ni Muhammad na gawin nila. Sa yugtong ito, kinukuha ng mga Muslim ang kanilang kinikita sa pamamagitan ng pagnanakaw.

    Through thievery, they accomplish two goals:
    Sa pamamagitan ng pagnanakaw, dalawang layunin ang kanilang natutupad:

    They collect wealth by taking other people’s money, animals, and goods.
    Nagiipon sila ng kayamanan sa pamamagitan ng pagkuha ng pera, hayop, at iba pang mga bagay mula sa ibang tao.
    They instill terror in the hearts of the disbelievers.
    Nakapagtatanim sila ng takot sa mga puso ng mga hindi naniniwala.

    Instilling terror is fundamental in Islam. It is one of the best and quickest ways to take down an enemy regardless of his size. When fear is in his heart, even an elephant will bow down to a mouse (which reminds me of Obama bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia). Muslims understand the significant change in the enemy’s life when he is afraid. They know that all they need to do is to be patient and wait for the fear to spread and take hold. With fear in his heart, the enemy will never win. (As long as America is in fear, it will never win.)
    Before he became the God-on-earth in Arabia, Muhammad made more than 56 attacks against merchants, 28 of those attacked were called Gazwah (caravan riders).
    Ang pagtatanim ng takot sa mga tao ay pangunahin sa Islam. Ito ang isa sa mga pinakamabisa at pinakamabilis na paraan upang magpabagsak ng kaaway kahit ano pang laki nito. Kapag ang takot ay nasa puso na, kahit ang isang elepante ay napapasuko sa daga (naalala ko ang pagsuko ni Obama sa hari ng Saudi Arabia). Nauunawaan ng mga Muslim na malaki ang nababago sa buhay ng kanyang kaaway kapag ito ay natatakot. Alam nila na kailangan lamang nilang gawin ay magtiyaga at mag-antay na kumalat at mamayani ang takot. Kapag ang puso ay may takot, hinding hindi mananalo ang kaaway. (Hanggat natatakot ang Amerika, hinding hindi ito mananalo.)
    Bago pa si Muhammad naging diyos sa Arabia, nakagawa na siya ng mahigit 56 na paglusob laban sa mga mangangalakal, ang 28 sa mga paglusob na ito ay tinawag na Gazwah (caravan riders).

    III. Stage of Total War; Either You Are With Me or Against Me
    III. Yugto ng Digmaan; Kakampi ba kita o Hindi

    In this final stage, Muhammad was no longer weak. He proclaimed his agenda in more open and clear words. Anyone who did not bow down to him was killed. All who refused him, especially those who opposed him—like the Jews, were killed.
    Sa huling yugto na ito, si Muhammad ay hindi na mahina. Inihahayag na niya ang kanyang adyenda ng mas bukas at malinaw. Sinumang hindi susunod sa kanya ay pinapatay. Lahat ng tumatanggi sa kanya, lalo na iyong mga sumasalungat sa kanya – kagaya ng mga Hudyo, ay kanyang pinatay.

    The Qur’an Identifies the Rightful Inhabitants of Israel
    Kinikilala ng Qur’an ang Tamang Maninirahan sa Israel

    We always hear the same arguments from either side of the Israeli-Palestinian debate. The Muslims say the Israelis took away their land, and the Israelis say it’s rightfully theirs since Biblical times. Unfortunately, the world is filled with liberal media exemplified by TV shows like Oprah’s, who does not know until now where coffee comes from, or shows like Jon Stewart’s, which make us laugh, but I am not sure at what. Beyond that is the YouTube propaganda. Regardless of numerous outlets for information, none of them are honest enough to discuss what is truly in the heart of the conflict.
    Palagi nating naririnig ang parehong argumento ng bawat kampo ng Israeli-Palestinian debate. Sinasabi ng mga Muslim na ninakaw ng mga taga-Israel ang kanilang lupain, at ang mga taga-Israel naman ay nagsasabing kanila talaga ang lupain simula pa noon na nakasaad sa Bibliya. Sa kasawiangpalad, ang mundo ay puno ng mga liberal media na makikita sa telebisyon kagaya ni Oprah na hindi man lamang alam kung saan galing ang kape, o katulad din ng palabas ni Jon Stewart na nagpapatawa nga sa atin ngunit hindi ko alam kung bakit nga ba. Bukod pa rito ay ang mga propaganda pa sa YouTube. Kahit ano pang dami ng pinagmumulan ng impormasyon, wala ni isa sa kanila ang tapat na nagtatalakay ng totoong isyu ng isang sagupaan.

    Let us do a real study and find out who really belongs in Israel. We will not use the he-said-she-said argument. We will present facts, and our facts will show that Israel belongs to the Jews. We already know that Israel belongs to the Jews according to the Bible, but we will set aside the Bible and get our evidence from the Qur’an itself. This is the best way to shut up the liberals and Qur’an worshipers who do not dare to say that the Qur’an is wrong.
    Pag-aralan natin ng mabuti at tuklasin kung sino talaga ang nabibilang sa Israel. Hindi tayo gagamit ng mga sabi-sabi lamang. Magbibigay lamang kami ng mga katotohan at ang mga katotohanang ito ay magpapatunay na ang Israel ay sa mga Hudyo. Alam na natin na ang Israel nga ay pag-aari ng mga Hudyo ayon sa Bibliya, ngunit atin muna isangtabi ang Bibliya at tingnan ang mga katibayan mula mismo sa Qur’an.

    Many of you do not know that the Qur’an declares in very clear words that Israel, or Palestine as some insist on calling it, is the land of the Jews. Let us read the following passage together:
    Marami sa inyo ang hindi alam na napakalinaw na inihahayag ng Qur’an ang Israel, o Palestine na gusto itawag ng iba, ay ang lupain ng mga Hudyo. Basahin natin ang mga sumusunod na talata:

  • Do Rashid Marneld Alhari Indasan DARE to debate me?

    Do Rashid Marneld Alhari Indasan DARE to debate me?

    Colossians 1:16

    For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:

    Muhammad the prophet with no prophecy & prophet with no miracles ?

    6:37

    6:37
    Dr. Ghali

    And they have said, “If (only) a sign had been sent down upon him from his Lord!” Say, “Surely Allah is Determiner over sending down a sign, but most of them do not know.” http://quran.com/6/37

    17:59

    17:59
    Yusuf Ali

    And We refrain from sending the signs, only because the men of former generations treated them as false: We sent the she-camel to the Thamud to open their eyes, but they treated her wrongfully: We only send the Signs by way of terror (and warning from evil). http://quran.com/17/59

    Christians believe Jesus is ALLAH ?????? LOL good one Muhammad?

    5:17

    to top
    5:17
    Pickthall

    They indeed have disbelieved who say: Lo! Allah is the Messiah, son of Mary. Say: Who then can do aught against Allah, if He had willed to destroy the Messiah son of Mary, and his mother and everyone on earth? Allah’s is the Sovereignty of the heavens and the earth and all that is between them. He createth what He will. And Allah is Able to do all things.

    Jesus Create from the mud a bird? Jesus can bring the dead to life? Jesus can tell you what you hide?
    3:49

    3:49
    Dr. Ghali

    And a Messenger to the Seeds (Or: sons) of Israel) (saying) that, “I have already come to you with a sign from your Lord that I create for you out of clay as the semblance of a bird, then I blow into it, so it is a bird by the permission of Allah; and I heal him (who was born) blind and the leper, and give life to the dead by the permission of Allah; and I (fully) inform you of what things you eat, and what you (safely) store in your homes. Surely in that is indeed a sign for you, in case you are (true) believers. http://quran.com/3/49

  • Heretic: Why Islam Needs a Reformation Now book review

    Heretic: Why Islam Needs a Reformation Now book review

    Watch my video and see my review but from here words we quote;

    “Today, she argues, the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims can be divided into a minority of extremists, a majority of observant but peaceable Muslims and a few dissidents who risk their lives by questioning their own religion. But there is only one Islam and, as Hirsi Ali shows, there is no denying that some of its key teachings—not least the duty to wage holy war—are incompatible with the values of a free society.

    For centuries it has seemed as if Islam is immune to change. But Hirsi Ali has come to believe that a Muslim Reformation—a revision of Islamic doctrine aimed at reconciling the religion with modernity—is now at hand, and may even have begun. The Arab Spring may now seem like a political failure. But its challenge to traditional authority revealed a new readiness—not least by Muslim women—to think freely and to speak out.

    Courageously challenging the jihadists, she identifies five key amendments to Islamic doctrine that Muslims have to make to bring their religion out of the seventh century and into the twenty-first. And she calls on the Western world to end its appeasement of the Islamists. “Islam is not a religion of peace,” she writes. It is the Muslim reformers who need our backing, not the opponents of free speech.

    Interweaving her own experiences, historical analogies and powerful examples from contemporary Muslim societies and cultures, Heretic is not a call to arms, but a passionate plea for peaceful change and a new era of global toleration. In the wake of the Charlie Hebdo murders, with jihadists killing thousands from Nigeria to Syria to Pakistan, this book offers an answer to what is fast becoming the world’s number one problem.”

  • No one can make Qur’an like Allah?

    No one can make Qur’an like Allah?

    The Qur’an it self many of is made by Satan as Allah said! but do not worry Allah will take it off????

    From the great respected names in Islam Imam “Al-Tabari” said:

    Satan Casts a False Revelation on
    the Messenger of God’s Tongue

    The Messenger of God was eager for the welfare of his people and wished to effect a reconciliation with them in whatever ways he could. It is said that he wanted to find a way to do this, and what happened was as follows.
    Ibn Humayd – Salamah – Muhammad b. Ishaq – Yazid b. Ziyad al-Madani – Muhammad b. Ka’b al-Qurazi: When the Messenger of God saw how his tribe turned their backs on him and was grieved to see them shunning the message he had brought to them from God, he longed in his soul that something would come to him from God which would reconcile him with his tribe. With his love for his tribe and his eagerness for their welfare it would have delighted him if some of the difficulties which they made for him could have been smoothed out, and he debated with himself and fervently desired such an outcome. Then God revealed:

    By the Star when it sets, your comrade does not err, nor is he deceived; nor does he speak out of (his own) desire…

    and when he came to the words:

    Have you thought upon al-Lat and al-‘Uzza and Manat, the third, the other?

    Satan cast on his tongue, because of his inner debates and what he desired to bring to his people, the words:

    These are the high-flying cranes; verily their intercession is accepted with approval.

    When Quraysh heard this, they rejoiced and were happy and delighted at the way in which he spoke of their gods, and they listened to him, while the Muslims, having complete trust in their Prophet in respect of the messages which he brought from God, did not suspect him of error, illusion, or mistake. When he came to the prostration, having completed the surah, he prostrated himself and the Muslims did likewise, following their Prophet, trusting in the message which he had brought and following his example. Those polytheists of the Quraysh and others who were in the mosque likewise prostrated themselves because of the reference to their gods which they had heard, so that there was no one in the mosque, believer or unbeliever, who did not prostrate himself. The one exception was al-Walid b. Al-Mughirah, who was a very old man and could not prostrate himself; but he took a handful of soil from the valley in his hand and bowed over that. Then they all dispersed from the mosque. The Quraysh left delighted by the mention of their gods which they had heard, saying, “Muhammad has mentioned our gods in the most favorable way possible, stating in his recitation that they are the high flying cranes and that their intercession is received with approval.”

    The news of the prostration reached those of the Messenger of God’s companions who were in Abyssinia and people said, “The Quraysh have accepted Islam.” Some rose up to return, while others remained behind. Then Gabriel came to the Messenger of God and said, “Muhammad, what have you done? You have recited to the people that which I did not bring to you from God, and you have said that which was not said to you.” Then the Messenger of God was much grieved and feared God greatly, but God sent down a revelation to him, for He was merciful to him, consoling him and making the matter light for him, informing him that there had never been a prophet or a messenger before him who desired as he desired and wished as he wished but that Satan had cast words into his recitation, as he had cast words on Muhammad’s tongue. Then God cancelled what Satan had thus cast, and established his verses by telling him that he was like other prophets and messengers, and revealed:

    Never did we send a messenger or a prophet before you but that when he recited (the Message) Satan cast words into his recitation (umniyyah). God abrogates what Satan casts. Then God established his verses. God is knower, wise.

    Thus God removed the sorrow from his Messenger, reassured him about that which he had feared and cancelled the words which Satan had cast on his tongue, that their gods were the high flying cranes whose intercession was accepted with approval. He now revealed, following the mention of “al-Lat, al-‘Uzza and Manat, the third, the other,” the words:

    Are yours the males and his the females? That indeed were an unfair division! They are but names which you have named, you and your fathers.

    to the words:

    to whom he wills and accepts.

    This means, how can the intercession of their gods avail with God?

    When Muhammad brought a revelation from God canceling what Satan had cast on the tongue of His Prophet, the Quraysh said, “Muhammad has repented of what he said concerning the position of your gods with God, and has altered it and brought something else.” Those two phrases which Satan had cast on the tongue of the Messenger of God were in the mouth of every polytheists, and they became even more ill-disposed and more violent in their persecution of those of them who had accepted Islam and followed the messenger of God.

    Those of the Companions of the Messenger of God who had left Abyssinia upon hearing that Quraysh had accepted Islam by prostrating themselves with the Messenger of God now approached. When they were near Mecca, they heard that the report that the people of Mecca had accepted Islam was false. Not one of them entered Mecca without obtaining protection or entering secretly. Among those who came to Mecca and remained there until they emigrated to al-Madinah and were present with the Prophet at Badr, were, from the Banu Abd Shams b. Abd Manaf b. Qusayy, Uthman b. ‘Affan b. Abi al-‘As b. Umayyah, accompanied by his wife Ruqayyah the daughter of the Messenger of God; Abu Hudhayfah b. ‘Utbah b. Rabi‘ah b. Abd Shams, accompanied by his wife Sahlah bt. Suhayl; together with a number of others numbering thirty three men.

    Al-Qasim b. Al-Hasan – al Husayn b. Daud – Hajja – Abu Ma‘shar – Muhammad b. Ka‘b al-Qurazi and Muhammad b. Qays: The Messenger of God was sitting in a large gathering of Quraysh, wishing that day that no revelation would come to him from God which could cause them to turn away from him. Then God revealed:

    By the Star when it sets, your comrade does not err, nor is he deceived…

    and the Messenger of God recited it until he came to:

    Have you thought upon al-Lat and al-Uzza and Manat, the third, the other?

    when Satan cast on his tongue two phrases:

    These are the high-flying cranes; verily their intercession is to be desired.

    He uttered them and went on to complete the surah. When he prostrated himself at the end of the surah, the whole company prostrated themselves with him. Al-Walid b. al-Mughirah raised some dust to his forehead and bowed over that, since he was a very old man and could not prostrate himself. They were satisfied with what Muhammad had uttered and said, “We recognize that it is God who gives life and death, who creates and who provides sustenance, but if these gods of ours intercede for us with him, and if you give them a share, we are with you.”

    That evening Gabriel came to him and reviewed the surah with him, and when he reached the two phrases which Satan had cast upon his tongue he said, “I did not bring you these two.” Then the Messenger of God said, “I have fabricated things against God and have imputed to him words which He has not spoken.” Then God revealed to him:

    And they indeed strove hard to beguile you away from what we have revealed to you, that you should invent other than it against us…

    to the words:

    and then you would have found no helper against us.

    He remained grief stricken and anxious until the revelation of the verse:

    Never did we send a messenger or a prophet before you… to the words… God is knower, wise.

    When those who had emigrated to Abyssinia heard that all the people of Mecca had accepted Islam, they returned to their clans, saying, “They are more dear to us”; but they found that the people had reversed their decision when God cancelled what Satan had cast upon the Messenger of God’s tongue. (The History of al-Tabari, translated and annotated by W. Montgomery Watt and M.V. McDonald [State University of New York Press (SUNY), Albany 1988], Volume 6, pp. 107-112)

    عن ابن عباس رضي الله عنه من طريق آخر فيما أخرجه الضياء في المختارة (10/234) : ( أخبرنا أبو القاسم بن أحمد بن أبي القاسم الخباز أن أبا الخير محمد بن رجاء بن ابراهيم أخبرهم ابنا أحمد بن عبد الرحمن ابنا أحمد بن موسى بن مردويه حدثني ابراهيم بن محمد حدثني أبو بكر محمد بن علي المقرىء البغدادي ثنا جعفر بن محمد الطيالسي ثنا ابراهيم بن محمد بن عرعرة ثنا أبو عاصم النبيل ثنا عثمان بن الأسود عن سعيد بن جبير عن ابن عباس أن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم قرأ أفرأيتم اللات والعزى ومناة الثالثة الأخرى تلك الغرانيق العلى و شفاعتهن ترتجا ففرح المشركون بذلك وقالوا قد ذكر آلهتنا فجاءه جبريل فقال اقرأ علي ما جئتك به قال فقرأ أفرأيتم اللات والعزى ومناة الثالثة الأخرى تلك الغرانيق العلى وشفاعتهن ترتجا فقال ما أتيتك بهذا هذا عن الشيطان أو قال هذا من الشيطان لم آتك بها فأنزل الله وما أرسلنا من قبلك من رسول ولا نبي إلا إذا تمنى ألقى الشيطان في أمنيته

     

    22:52

    22:52

    Sahih International

    And We did not send before you any messenger or prophet except that when he spoke [or recited], Satan threw into it [some misunderstanding]. But Allah abolishes that which Satan throws in; then Allah makes precise His verses. And Allah is Knowing and Wise.

    Tafsir Ibn Kathir; http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2494&Itemid=77

    How the Shaytan threw some Falsehood into the Words of the Messengers, and how Allah abolished!

    At this point many of the scholars of Tafsir mentioned the story of the Gharaniq and how many of those who had migrated to Ethiopia came back when they thought that the idolators of the Quraysh had become Muslims, but these reports all come through Mursal chains of narration and I do not think that any of them may be regarded as Sahih. And Allah knows best. Al-Bukhari said, “Ibn `Abbas said,

    ﴿فِى أُمْنِيَّتِهِ﴾

    (in his recitation (of the revelation).) “When he spoke, the Shaytan threw (some falsehood) into his speech, but Allah abolished that which the Shaytan threw in.”

    ﴿ثُمَّ يُحْكِمُ اللَّهُ ءَايَـتِهِ﴾

    (Then Allah establishes His revelations.) `Ali bin Abi Talhah reported that Ibn `Abbas said,

    ﴿إِذَا تَمَنَّى أَلْقَى الشَّيْطَـنُ فِى أُمْنِيَّتِهِ﴾

    (when he did recite (the revelation), Shaytan threw (some falsehood) in it) “When he spoke, the Shaytan threw (some falsehood) into his speech.” Mujahid said:

    ﴿إِذَا تُمْنَى﴾

    (when he did recite) “When he spoke.” It was said that it refers to his recitation, whereas,

    ﴿إِلاَّ أَمَانِىَّ﴾

    (but they trust upon Amani) means they speak but they do not write. Al-Baghawi and the majority of the scholars of Tafsir said:

    ﴿تَمَنَّى﴾

    (he did recite) “Reciting the Book of Allah.”

    ﴿أَلْقَى الشَّيْطَـنُ فِى أُمْنِيَّتِهِ﴾

    (Shaytan threw (some falsehood) in it) “In his recitation.” Ad-Dahhak said:

    ﴿إِذَا تُمْنَى﴾

    (when he did recite) “When he recited.” Ibn Jarir said, “This comment is more akin to interpretation.”

    ﴿فَيَنسَخُ اللَّهُ مَا يُلْقِى الشَّيْطَـنُ﴾

    (But Yansakh Allah that which Shaytan throws in.) The meaning of the word Naskh in Arabic is to remove or lift away. `Ali bin Abi Talhah reported that Ibn `Abbas said, “This means, Allah cancels out that which the Shaytan throws in.”

    ﴿وَاللَّهُ عَلِيمٌ﴾

    (And Allah is All-Knower,) means, He knows all matters and events that will happen, and nothing whatsoever is hidden from Him.

    ﴿حَكِيمٌ﴾

    (All-Wise.) means, in His decree, creation and command, He has perfect wisdom and absolute proof, hence He says:

    ﴿لِّيَجْعَلَ مَا يُلْقِى الشَّيْطَـنُ فِتْنَةً لِّلَّذِينَ فِى قُلُوبِهِم مَّرَضٌ﴾

    (That He (Allah) may make what is thrown in by Shaytan a trial for those in whose hearts is a disease) meaning, doubt, Shirk, disbelief and hypocrisy. Ibn Jurayj said:

    ﴿الَّذِينَ فِى قُلُوبِهِمْ مَّرَضٌ﴾

    (those in whose hearts is a disease) “The hypocrites, and

    ﴿وَالْقَاسِيَةِ قُلُوبُهُمْ﴾

    (and whose hearts are hardened.) means the idolators.”

    ﴿وَإِنَّ الظَّـلِمِينَ لَفِى شِقَاقٍ بَعِيدٍ﴾

    (And certainly, the wrongdoers are in an opposition far-off.) means, far away in misguidance, resistance and stubbornness, i.e., far from the truth and the correct way.

    ﴿وَلِيَعْلَمَ الَّذِينَ أُوتُواْ الْعِلْمَ أَنَّهُ الْحَقُّ مِن رَّبِّكَ فَيُؤْمِنُواْ بِهِ﴾

    (And that those who have been given knowledge may know that it is the truth from your Lord, so that they may believe therein,) means, `so that those who have been given beneficial knowledge with which they may differentiate between truth and falsehood, those who believe in Allah and His Messenger, may know that what We have revealed to you is the truth from your Lord, Who has revealed it by His knowledge and under His protection, and He will guard it from being mixed with anything else.’ Indeed, it is the Wise Book which,

    ﴿لاَّ يَأْتِيهِ الْبَـطِلُ مِن بَيْنِ يَدَيْهِ وَلاَ مِنْ خَلْفِهِ تَنزِيلٌ مِّنْ حَكِيمٍ حَمِيدٍ ﴾

    (Falsehood cannot come to it from before it or behind it, (it is) sent down by the All-Wise, Worthy of all praise (Allah).) ﴿41:42﴾

    ﴿فَيُؤْمِنُواْ بِهِ﴾

    (so that they may believe therein,) means, that they may believe that it is true and act upon it.

    ﴿فَتُخْبِتَ لَهُ قُلُوبُهُمْ﴾

    Allah copying ‘Umar ib Al-Khatab words and making it Qur’an as ‘umar said ?

    book 8 Prayers (Salat) hadith 23 Al Bukhari

    (32)
    Chapter: What has been said about (facing) the Qiblah (Kabah at Makkah) and wherever considered that there was no need to repeat the Salat (prayer) if someone offered prayers by mistake facing a direction other than that of the Qiblah
    (32)
    بَابُ مَا جَاءَ فِي الْقِبْلَةِ، وَمَنْ لاَ يَرَى الإِعَادَةَ عَلَى مَنْ سَهَا فَصَلَّى إِلَى غَيْرِ الْقِبْلَةِ
    وَقَدْ سَلَّمَ النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فِي رَكْعَتَيِ الظُّهْرِ، وَأَقْبَلَ عَلَى النَّاسِ بِوَجْهِهِ، ثُمَّ أَتَمَّ مَا بَقِيَ.

    Narrated `Umar (bin Al-Khattab):

    My Lord agreed with me in three things: -1. I said, “O Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ), I wish we took the station of Abraham as our praying place (for some of our prayers). So came the Divine Inspiration: And take you (people) the station of Abraham as a place of prayer (for some of your prayers e.g. two rak`at of Tawaf of Ka`ba)”. (2.125) -2. And as regards the (verse of) the veiling of the women, I said, ‘O Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ)! I wish you ordered your wives to cover themselves from the men because good and bad ones talk to them.’ So the verse of the veiling of the women was revealed. -3. Once the wives of the Prophet (ﷺ) made a united front against the Prophet (ﷺ) and I said to them, ‘It may be if he (the Prophet) divorced you, (all) that his Lord (Allah) will give him instead of you wives better than you.’ So this verse (the same as I had said) was revealed.” (66.5).

    حَدَّثَنَا عَمْرُو بْنُ عَوْنٍ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا هُشَيْمٌ، عَنْ حُمَيْدٍ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ، قَالَ قَالَ عُمَرُ وَافَقْتُ رَبِّي فِي ثَلاَثٍ، فَقُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ لَوِ اتَّخَذْنَا مِنْ مَقَامِ إِبْرَاهِيمَ مُصَلًّى فَنَزَلَتْ ‏{‏وَاتَّخِذُوا مِنْ مَقَامِ إِبْرَاهِيمَ مُصَلًّى‏}‏ وَآيَةُ الْحِجَابِ قُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ، لَوْ أَمَرْتَ نِسَاءَكَ أَنْ يَحْتَجِبْنَ، فَإِنَّهُ يُكَلِّمُهُنَّ الْبَرُّ وَالْفَاجِرُ‏.‏ فَنَزَلَتْ آيَةُ الْحِجَابِ، وَاجْتَمَعَ نِسَاءُ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فِي الْغَيْرَةِ عَلَيْهِ فَقُلْتُ لَهُنَّ عَسَى رَبُّهُ إِنْ طَلَّقَكُنَّ أَنْ يُبَدِّلَهُ أَزْوَاجًا خَيْرًا مِنْكُنَّ‏.‏ فَنَزَلَتْ هَذِهِ الآيَةُ‏.‏

    Reference  : Sahih al-Bukhari 402
    In-book reference  : Book 8, Hadith 53
    USC-MSA web (English) reference  : Vol. 1, Book 8, Hadith 395
    http://sunnah.com/bukhari/8/53
  • Submission: Part 1 a hero to remember “Theo van Gogh”

    Submission: Part 1 a hero to remember “Theo van Gogh”

    Short film (2004) on the mistreatment of women in the Islam. The director, Theo van Gogh, was murdered in Novermber 2004 by Mohammed Bouyeri.

  • Che Guevara or Muhammad who killed more?

    Che Guevara or Muhammad who killed more?

    Crimes against humanity under Communist regimes

  • 70,000 boy for sex in haven for every Muslim

    70,000 boy for sex in haven for every Muslim

    Who ever said to you “believe on me I will give you women and boys for sex, he is The Satan pimp”
    52:20

    52:20
    Sahih International

    They will be reclining on thrones lined up, and We will marry them to fair women with large, [beautiful] eyes.

    52:22

    to top
    52:22
    Sahih International

    And We will provide them with fruit and meat from whatever they desire.

    52:23

    to top
    52:23
    Sahih International

    They will exchange with one another a cup [of wine] wherein [results] no ill speech or commission of sin.

    52:24
    Sahih International

    There will circulate among them [servant] boys [especially] for them, as if they were pearls well-protected.

    Quran-(52:17-20): “They will recline (with ease) on thrones arranged in ranks. And We shall marry them to Huris (fair females) with wide lovely eyes.” “There they shall pass from hand to hand a (wine) cup, free from any Laghw….”

    Quran: (37:40-48): …they will sit with bashful, dark-eyed virgins, as chaste as the             sheltered eggs of ostriches.

    Quran: (44:51-55): Yes and we shall wed them to dark-eyed houris (beautiful virgins).

    Quran: (55:56-57):  In them will be bashful virgins neither man nor Jinn will have touched before. Then which of the favours of your Lord will you deny?

    Quran-(55:72): “Hur (beautiful, fair females) guarded in pavilions;”

    Quran: (78:31):  “As for the righteous, they surely triumph. Their gardens and vineyards and high-bosomed (pointed breast) virgins for companions, truly overflowing cup”

    Quran-(78: 33-34):“And young full-breasted (mature) maidens of equal age, and a full cup of wine.”

    Quran-(55:57-58): “Then which of the blessings of your lord will you both (jinn and men) deny? (In beauty) they are like rubies and coral”.

    Quran-(56:7-40): “ …we created the houris and made them virgins, loving companions for those on the right hand….”

    Quran-(55:70-77):  “ In each there shall be virgins chaste and fair….dark eyed virgins sheltered in their tents whom neither man or Jinn have touched before…”

    Quran-56:22: “And (there will be) Huris with wide, lovely eyes (as wives for the pious)”

    Quran-(56: 35-36): “Verily , We have created them (maidens) of special creation. And made them Virgins.”

    Quran- (55:56): “Wherein both will be Qasirat-ut-Tarf (chaste females restraining their glances, desiring none except their husband) with whom no man or jinni has had tamth before them.”

    Quran: (2:25):  “And give glad tidings to those who believe and do righteous good deeds, that for them will be Gardens under which rivers flow (Paradise)……….and they will be given these things in resemblance (i.e., in the same form but different in taste) and they shall have therein Azwajun Muhtahharatun (purified mates and wives) and that they will have abide therein forever”.

    Quran:(47:15): “The description of Paradise which the Muttaqun have been promised (is that) in it are rivers of water the taste and smell of which are not changed, rivers of milk of which the taste never changes, rivers of wine delicious to those who drink, and rivers of clarified honey……….”

    Quran-(40-45): “Surely for the God-fearing awaits a place of security gardens and vineyards and maidens with swelling (protruding) bosoms.”

  • Go buy the Christian women we capture

    Go buy the Christian women we capture

    Watch and learn how filthy this cult is called Islam;

    Vol. 3-#765 Narrated Kuraib: the freed slave of Ibn ‘Abbas, that Maimuna bint Al-Harith told him that she manumitted a slave-girl without taking the permission of the Prophet. On the day when it was her turn to be with the Prophet, she said, “Do you know, O Allah’s Apostle, that I have manumitted my slave-girl?” He said, “Have you really?” She replied in the affirmative. He said, “You would have got more reward if you had given her (i.e. the slave-girl) to one of your maternal uncles.”

    Vol. 7-#734 “….At the door of the [Muhammad’s] room there was a slave to whom I went and said, “Ask the permission for me to enter”…..

    Vol. 5-#512 Narrated Anas: “…..The prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives….”

    33:50 – “Prophet, We have made lawful to you the wives to whom you have granted dowries and the slave girls whom God has given you as booty.”

    This verse clearly shows that Muslims believe that taking slaves in war was a God-given right. These slaves were considered ‘booty’ or the spoils of war. As the saying goes: to the victors go the spoils. ~Silas

    THE RIGHTS OF SLAVES UNDER ISLAM
    According to the Hughes Dictionary of Islam, slaves had few civil or legal rights. For example:

    a) Muslim men were allowed to have sex anytime with females slaves – Sura 4:3, 4:29, 33:49.
    b) Slaves are as helpless before their masters as idols are before God – Sura 16:77
    c) According to Islamic Tradition, people at the time of their capture were either to be killed, or enslaved. Shows you that they were at the bottom of the barrel to start with.
    d) According to Islamic jurisprudence, slaves were merchandise. The sales of slaves was in accordance with the sale of animals.
    e) Muhammad ordered that some slaves who were freed by their master be RE-ENSLAVED!
    f) It is permissible under Islamic law to whip slaves.
    g) According to Islam, a Muslim could not be put to death for murdering a slave. Ref. 2:178 and the Jalalayn confirm this.
    h) According to Islam, the testimony of slaves is not admissible in court. Ibn Timiyya and Bukhari state this.
    i) According to Islamic jurisprudence, slaves cannot choose their own marriage mate. – Ibn Hazm, vol. 6, part 9.
    j) According to Islamic jurisprudence, slaves can be forced to marry who their masters want. – Malik ibn Anas, vol. 2, page 155.
    —
    The passage’s context here (not quoted in full) details how Muslim males are allowed to have sexual relations with their wives and slave girls. Implicit in this is that Muslim males had slave-concubines. 70:30 is basically a repeat of 23:5.

    Ibn Sa’d’s “Tabaqat”, gives a clear description of Muhammad having “relations” with at least one of his slave girls. Muhammad had sexual relations with Mariyah, his Coptic slave. Mariyah and her sister, Sirin were slaves given as gifts to Muhammad. Muhammad gave Sirin to Hasan Thabit, the poet. Ibn Sa’d says that Muhammad “liked Mariyah, who was of white complexion, with curly hair and pretty.” [Taken from Ibn Sa’d’s “Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir” (Book of the Major Classes), p151].

    Ibn Sa’d also writes that Mariyah bore Muhammad a son named Ibrahim. He died 18 months later. Sa’d writes: “If he had lived, no maternal uncle of his would have remained in bondage”, p164. This shows that there were other Coptic slaves owned by the Muslims.

    ISLAM ALLOW MUSLIMS to marry slaves if they so desire (4:24), and to free them at times as a penalty for crime or sin (4:92, 5:89, 58:3) and even allows slaves to buy their liberty, if they meet certain of their master’s conditions (24:33). [90:10 ‘freeing of a bondsman’ refers to Muslims ransoming other Muslims who were slaves of non-Muslims.]

    23:5 – “… except with their wives and slave girls, for these are lawful to them:…”

    In effect, Muhammad okayed the rape of female prisoners.
    Vol. 3-#765 Narrated Kuraib: the freed slave of Ibn ‘Abbas, that Maimuna bint Al-Harith told him that she manumitted a slave-girl without taking the permission of the Prophet. On the day when it was her turn to be with the Prophet, she said, “Do you know, O Allah’s Apostle, that I have manumitted my slave-girl?” He said, “Have you really?” She replied in the affirmative. He said, “You would have got more reward if you had given her (i.e. the slave-girl) to one of your maternal uncles.”

    Vol. 7-#734 “….At the door of the [Muhammad’s] room there was a slave to whom I went and said, “Ask the permission for me to enter”…..
    This is a long Hadith, and the quote reveals that Muhammad has slaves working in his house.

  • Equality in Islam Negro Rebellion 500000 black slave in one Islamic city

    Equality in Islam Negro Rebellion 500000 black slave in one Islamic city

    Many Muslims try to deceive western, or non-Muslims, with false translation or quotation from what they claim is about Equality in Islam and this is just one more example of this deception;

    Book name Misconceptions On Human Rights In Islam
    by:  Abdulrahman A. Al-Sheha.

    “All individuals are equal in Islamic code of law. Penalties, judgements and legal sentences are applicable to all classes of people without any distinction. There are no particular forms of penalties or sentences for a certain class of people. All people are equal within the jurisdiction of Islamic law. No individual or class of people has immunity over and above the Islamic laws.”

    I will post few of Islamic rules to expose the claim of Justice and Equality in Islam and you be the Judge!

    O ye who believe! the law of equality is prescribed to you in cases of murder: the free for the free, the slave for the slave, the woman for the woman. But if any remission is made by the brother of the slain, then grant any reasonable demand, and compensate him with handsome gratitude, this is a concession and a Mercy from your Lord. After this whoever exceeds the limits shall be in grave penalty.

    (  سورة البقرة  , Al-Baqara, Chapter #2, Verse #178)

    1. If you are a white Arab man and you kill a slave then the punishment is killing your slave!!!
    2. So now we have two Slaves dead under the justice of Allah!
    3. Women for the woman?
    4. Free Muslim will be killed as a penalty of killing Free man?
    5. This is mean if a free man kill a slave he will not be killed!

    No Muslim will be Kileed for killing non-Muslim?

    from his father, from his grandfather that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: “The Muslim is not killed for disbeliever.” And with this chain, it has been narrated that the Prophet (ﷺ) said: “The blood-money paid for disbeliever is half of the blood-money paid for a believer.”

     

    Grade : Good (Darussalam)
    Reference  : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1413
    In-book reference  : Book 16, Hadith 29
    English translation  : Vol. 3, Book 14, Hadith 1413

    http://sunnah.com/tirmidhi/16/29

    if you are not a Muslim you are half human?

    Yahya related to me from Malik from Yahya ibn Said that Sulayman ibn Yasar said, “The blood-money of a magian is eight hundred dirhams.”
    Malik said, “This is what is done in our community.”
    Malik said, “The blood-monies of the jew, christian, and magian in their injuries, is according to the injury of the muslims in their blood-moneys. The head wound is a twentieth of his full blood-money. The wound that opens the head is a third of his blood-money. The belly-wound is a third of his blood-money. All their injuries are according to this calculation.”
    وَحَدَّثَنِي يَحْيَى، عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ سَعِيدٍ، أَنَّ سُلَيْمَانَ بْنَ يَسَارٍ، كَانَ يَقُولُ دِيَةُ الْمَجُوسِيِّ ثَمَانِي مِائَةِ دِرْهَمٍ ‏.‏ قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَهُوَ الأَمْرُ عِنْدَنَا ‏.‏ قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَجِرَاحُ الْيَهُودِيِّ وَالنَّصْرَانِيِّ وَالْمَجُوسِيِّ فِي دِيَاتِهِمْ عَلَى حِسَابِ جِرَاحِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ فِي دِيَاتِهِمُ الْمُوضِحَةُ نِصْفُ عُشْرِ دِيَتِهِ وَالْمَأْمُومَةُ ثُلُثُ دِيَتِهِ وَالْجَائِفَةُ ثُلُثُ دِيَتِهِ فَعَلَى حِسَابِ ذَلِكَ جِرَاحَاتُهُمْ كُلُّهَا ‏.‏
    USC-MSA web (English) reference  : Book 43, Hadith 8
    Arabic reference  : Book 43, Hadith 1583

    http://sunnah.com/urn/416422

    It was narrated from ‘Amr Bin Shu’aib, from his father, that his grandfather said:
    “The Messenger of Allah said: ‘The blood money for Ahl Adh-Dhimmah is half that of the blood money for the Muslims, and they are the Jews and Christians.”
    أَخْبَرَنَا عَمْرُو بْنُ عَلِيٍّ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ رَاشِدٍ، عَنْ سُلَيْمَانَ بْنِ مُوسَى، وَذَكَرَ، كَلِمَةً مَعْنَاهَا عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ شُعَيْبٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ جَدِّهِ، قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ “‏ عَقْلُ أَهْلِ الذِّمَّةِ نِصْفُ عَقْلِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ ‏”‏ ‏.‏ وَهُمُ الْيَهُودُ وَالنَّصَارَى ‏.‏
    Grade : Good (Darussalam)
    Reference  : Sunan an-Nasa’i 4806
    In-book reference  : Book 45, Hadith 101
    English translation  : Vol. 5, Book 45, Hadith 4810

    http://sunnah.com/nasai/45/101

    It was narrated from ‘Amr bin Shu’aib, from his grandfather, that :

    the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) ruled that the blood money for the people of the book is half of that of the blood money for the Muslims, and they are the Jews and Christians.

    حَدَّثَنَا هِشَامُ بْنُ عَمَّارٍ، حَدَّثَنَا حَاتِمُ بْنُ إِسْمَاعِيلَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ عَيَّاشٍ، عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ شُعَيْبٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ جَدِّهِ، ‏.‏ أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَضَى أَنَّ عَقْلَ أَهْلِ الْكِتَابَيْنِ نِصْفُ عَقْلِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ وَهُمُ الْيَهُودُ وَالنَّصَارَى ‏.‏
    Grade : Hasan (Darussalam)
    English reference  : Vol. 3, Book 21, Hadith 2644
    Arabic reference  : Book 21, Hadith 2746

    http://sunnah.com/urn/1269610

    If you are not a Muslim your blood and money is open to be taken and your women to be enslaved;

    Narrated Maimun bin Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

    قَالَ ابْنُ أَبِي مَرْيَمَ أَخْبَرَنَا يَحْيَى، حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدٌ، حَدَّثَنَا أَنَسٌ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم‏.‏ وَقَالَ عَلِيُّ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ حَدَّثَنَا خَالِدُ بْنُ الْحَارِثِ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدٌ قَالَ سَأَلَ مَيْمُونُ بْنُ سِيَاهٍ أَنَسَ بْنَ مَالِكٍ قَالَ يَا أَبَا حَمْزَةَ، مَا يُحَرِّمُ دَمَ الْعَبْدِ وَمَالَهُ فَقَالَ مَنْ شَهِدَ أَنْ لاَ إِلَهَ إِلاَّ اللَّهُ، وَاسْتَقْبَلَ قِبْلَتَنَا، وَصَلَّى صَلاَتَنَا، وَأَكَلَ ذَبِيحَتَنَا، فَهُوَ الْمُسْلِمُ، لَهُ مَا لِلْمُسْلِمِ، وَعَلَيْهِ مَا عَلَى الْمُسْلِمِ‏.‏
    Reference  : Sahih al-Bukhari 393
    In-book reference  : Book 8, Hadith 45
    USC-MSA web (English) reference  : Vol. 1, Book 8, Hadith 387
      (deprecated numbering scheme

    Islam the gang Acept Islam or you will be dead or we take your land and throw you out like a dog!(Islamic Justice)

    It has been narrated on the authority of Abu Huraira who said:

    “We were (sitting) in the mosque when the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) came to us and said: (Let us) go to the Jews. We went out with him until we came to them. The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) stood up and called out to them (saying): O ye assembly of Jews, accept Islam (and) you will be safe. They said: Abu’l-Qasim, you have communicated (God’s Message to us). The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: I want this (i. e. you should admit that God’s Message has been communicated to you), accept Islam and you would be safe. They said: Abu’l-Qisim, you have communicated (Allah’s Message). The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: I want this… – He said to them (the same words) the third time (and on getting the same reply) he added: You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I wish that I should expel you from this land Those of you who have any property with them should sell it, otherwise they should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle (and they may have to go away leaving everything behind).”

    حَدَّثَنَا قُتَيْبَةُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا لَيْثٌ، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ أَبِي، هُرَيْرَةَ أَنَّهُ قَالَ بَيْنَا نَحْنُ فِي الْمَسْجِدِ إِذْ خَرَجَ إِلَيْنَا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقَالَ ‏”‏ انْطَلِقُوا إِلَى يَهُودَ ‏”‏ ‏.‏ فَخَرَجْنَا مَعَهُ حَتَّى جِئْنَاهُمْ فَقَامَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَنَادَاهُمْ فَقَالَ ‏”‏ يَا مَعْشَرَ يَهُودَ أَسْلِمُوا تَسْلَمُوا ‏”‏ ‏.‏ فَقَالُوا قَدْ بَلَّغْتَ يَا أَبَا الْقَاسِمِ ‏.‏ فَقَالَ لَهُمْ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏”‏ ذَلِكَ أُرِيدُ أَسْلِمُوا تَسْلَمُوا ‏”‏ ‏.‏ فَقَالُوا قَدْ بَلَّغْتَ يَا أَبَا الْقَاسِمِ ‏.‏ فَقَالَ لَهُمْ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏”‏ ذَلِكَ أُرِيدُ ‏”‏ ‏.‏ فَقَالَ لَهُمُ الثَّالِثَةَ فَقَالَ ‏”‏ اعْلَمُوا أَنَّمَا الأَرْضُ لِلَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ وَأَنِّي أُرِيدُ أَنْ أُجْلِيَكُمْ مِنْ هَذِهِ الأَرْضِ فَمَنْ وَجَدَ مِنْكُمْ بِمَالِهِ شَيْئًا فَلْيَبِعْهُ وَإِلاَّ فَاعْلَمُوا أَنَّ الأَرْضَ لِلَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ ‏”‏ ‏.‏
    Reference  : Sahih Muslim 1765
    In-book reference  : Book 32, Hadith 72
    USC-MSA web (English) reference  : Book 19, Hadith 4363

    http://sunnah.com/muslim/32/72

    Islam and sex slaves watch the video;

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxKCUr2jFT0

  • JESUS CHRIST IS GOD FROM QURAN & MUHMAD MOUTH

    JESUS CHRIST IS GOD FROM QURAN & MUHMAD MOUTH

    Jesus’ Superiority Revisited

    Being a further response to a Muslim Dawagandist

    Sam Shamoun

    This is a continuation of our response (*) to Bassam Zawadi’s reply (*) to our articles concerning the Quran’s emphatic teaching that Jesus and his mother are vastly superior to everyone, especially to Muhammad and his family which includes his own mother as well (1, 2).

    Satan’s touch and Jesus’ Sinlessness Revisited

    In response to the hadith I sourced which stated that Jesus and Mary were the only individuals that Satan wasn’t able to prick at their births, Zawadi says:

    This cited hadith has nothing to do with sinfulness or sinlessness; because Satan only misguides those who can distinguish between what is good and evil. At the time of birth, any person including Maryam and ‘Isa is unable to recognize good and evil, so this touch has no effect on his/her sinfulness or sinlessness.

    In his haste to refute the significance that this hadith has on the status and impeccability of both Jesus and his blessed mother Zawadi conveniently fails to explain to his readers the import and meaning of this narrative. Zawadi tells us what it doesn’t mean but doesn’t bother to explain what it does mean and what relevance Satan’s failure in touching Jesus and Mary has on their status and uniqueness. In light of his failure it is up to us to educate Zawadi and to explain to his readers why this narrative is so significant in establishing the sinlessness of both Jesus and Mary.

    According to the hadith literature every person has a satan or jinn attached to him, including Muhammad:

    Chapter 14: THE MISCHIEF OF SATAN IN THE MUSLIM SOCIETY AND SENDING HIS DETACHMENTS FOR THE CREATION OF TURMOIL, AND THERE IS A DEVIL ATTACHED TO EVERY PERSON …

    Abdullah b. Mas’ud reported that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: There is none amongst you with whom is not an attaché from amongst the jinn (devil). They (the Companions) said: Allah’s Messenger, with you too? Thereupon he said: Yes, but Allah helps me against him and so I am safe from his hand and he does not command me but for good. (Sahih Muslim, Book 039, Number 6757)

    Narrated Aisha:
    Aisha said: One day Allah’s Apostle (peace be upon him) went out of her (Aisha’s apartment) during the night and she felt jealous. Then he came and he saw me (in what agitated state of mind) I was. He said: Aisha, what has happened to you? Do you feel jealous? Thereupon she said: How can it be (that a woman like me) should not feel jealous in regard to a husband like you? Thereupon Allah’s Apostle (peace be upon him) said: It was your devil who had come to you, and she said: Allah’s Apostle (peace be upon him) is there along with me a devil? He said: Yes. I said: Is devil attached to everyone? He said: Yes. I (Aisha) again said: Allah’s Apostle (peace be upon him) is it with you also? He said: Yes, but my Lord has helped me against him as such I am absolutely safe from his mischief. (Sahih Muslim, Book 039, Number 6759)

    Note carefully what Muhammad is reported to have said… Allah helped him against his satan’s mischief. This implies that, a) a person’s satan causes that individual to do what is wrong, and b) Muhammad’s devil was causing him to commit sins and mischief up until Allah helped his “messenger” against his demon.

    We know that Muhammad’s demon was guiding him into error because both the Quran and Islamic narratives mention that Satan deceived Muhammad and had tainted his heart (meaning his inner being). This necessitated that his heart be purified in order to remove Satan’s influence and control upon him:

    Anas b. Malik reported that Gabriel came to the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) while he was playing with his playmates. He took hold of him and lay him prostrate on the ground and tore open his breast and took out the heart from it and then extracted a blood-clot out of it and said: That was THE PART OF SATAN IN THEE. And then he washed it with the water of Zamzam in a golden basin and then it was joined together and restored to its place. The boys came running to his mother, i.e. his nurse, and said: Verily Muhammad has been murdered. They all rushed toward him (and found him all right). His color was changed, Anas said. I myself saw the marks of a needle on his breast. (Sahih Muslim, Book 1, Number 311)

    Ahmad b. Muhammad b. Habib al-Tusi – Abu Daud al-Tayalisi – Ja‘far b. ‘Abdullah b. ‘Uthman al-Qurashi – ‘Umar b. ‘Urwah b. al-Zubayr – ‘Urwah b. al-Zubayr – Abu Dharr al-Ghifari: I said, “O Messenger, how did you first know with absolute certainty that you were a prophet?” “Abu Dharr,” he replied, ‘Two angels came to me while I was somewhere in the Valley of Mecca. One of them came down to earth, while the other remained between heaven and earth… Then one said to the other, ‘Open his breast.’ He opened my breast, and then he said, ‘Take out his heart’ or ‘open his heart.’ He opened my heart, and took out from it the pollution of Satan and a clot of blood, and threw them away. Then one said to the other, ‘Wash his breast as you would a receptacle–or, wash his heart as you would a covering.’” … (The History of al-Tabari – Muhammad at Mecca, translated and annotated by W. Montgomery Watt and M. V. McDonald [State University of New York Press (SUNY), Albany 1988], Volume VI (6), p. 75; bold and underline emphasis ours)

    Muhammad also believed that Satan circulates in a person’s body, himself included:

    Narrated Safiya bint Huyai:
    The wife of the Prophet that she went to Allah’s Apostle while he was in Itikaf (staying in the mosque) during the last ten nights of the month of Ramadan. She spoke to him for an hour (a while) at night and then she got up to return home. The Prophet got up to accompany her, and when they reached the gate of the mosque opposite the dwelling place of Um Salama, the wife of the Prophet, two Ansari men passed by, and greeting Allah’s Apostle , they quickly went ahead. Allah’s Apostle said to them, “Do not be in a hurry. She is Safiya, the daughter of Huyai.” They said, “Subhan Allah! O Allah’s Apostle (how dare we suspect you).” That was a great thing for both of them. The Prophet then said, “Satan runs in the body of Adam’s son (i.e. man) as his blood circulates in it, and I was afraid that he (Satan) might insert an evil thought in your hearts.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 73, Number 238)

    Muhammad also came under the control of magic, a Satanic art, to such an extent that he actually thought he was having sex with his wives when he wasn’t!

    Narrated ‘Aisha:
    The Prophet continued for such-and-such period imagining that he has slept (had sexual relations) with his wives, and in fact he did not. One day he said, to me, “O ‘Aisha! Allah has instructed me regarding a matter about which I had asked Him. There came to me two men, one of them sat near my feet and the other near my head. The one near my feet, asked the one near my head (pointing at me), ‘What is wrong with this man? The latter replied, ‘He is under the effect of magic.’ The first one asked, ‘Who had worked magic on him?’ The other replied, ‘Lubaid bin Asam.’ The first one asked, ‘What material (did he use)?’ The other replied, ‘The skin of the pollen of a male date tree with a comb and the hair stuck to it, kept under a stone in the well of Dharwan.’” Then the Prophet went to that well and said, “This is the same well which was shown to me in the dream. The tops of its date-palm trees look like the heads of the devils, and its water looks like the Henna infusion.” Then the Prophet ordered that those things be taken out. I said, “O Allah’s Apostle! Won’t you disclose (the magic object)?” The Prophet said, “Allah has cured me and I hate to circulate the evil among the people.” ‘Aisha added, “(The magician) Lubaid bin Asam was a man from Bani Zuraiq, an ally of the Jews.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 73, Number 89)

    If this weren’t bad enough Satan even inspired Muhammad!

    We sent not ever any Messenger or Prophet before thee, but that Satan cast into his fancy, when he was fancying; but God annuls what Satan casts, then God confirms His signs — surely God is All-knowing, All-wise — S. 22:52

    The expositors say that this was “revealed” in connection with Satan causing Muhammad to recite verses from the devil:

    And We did not send before you any messenger (rasul) — this is a prophet who has been commanded to deliver a Message — or prophet (nabi) — one who has not been commanded to deliver anything — but that when he recited [the scripture] Satan cast into his recitation, what is not from the Qur’an, but which those to whom he [the prophet] had been sent would find pleasing. The Prophet (s) had, during an assembly of the [men of] Quraysh, after reciting the [following verses from] surat al-Najm, Have you considered Lat and ‘Uzza? And Manat, the third one? [53:19-20] added, as a result of Satan casting them onto his tongue without his [the Prophet’s] being aware of it, [the following words]: ‘those are the high-flying cranes (al-gharaniq al-‘ula) and indeed their intercession is to be hoped for’, and so they [the men of Quraysh] were thereby delighted. Gabriel, however, later informed him [the Prophet] of this that Satan had cast onto his tongue and he was grieved by it; but was [subsequently] comforted with this following verse that he might be reassured [of God’s pleasure]: thereat God abrogates, nullifies, whatever Satan had cast, then God confirms His revelations. And God is Knower, of Satan’s casting of that which has been mentioned, Wise, in His enabling him [Satan] to do such things, for He does whatever He will. (Tafsir al-Jalalayn; source; bold and underline emphasis)

    (Never sent We a messenger or a prophet before thee…) [22:52]. The commentators of the Qur’an said: “When the Messenger of Allah, Allah bless him and give him peace, saw that his people were shunning him, he was aggrieved by their rejection of the message he brought them and he secretly wished that Allah, exalted is He, reveals something to him which would bring him and his people closer to each other, keen as he was to see them accept faith. One day, he sat in one of the congregations of Quraysh which attracted a huge number of its members, and he wished that Allah, exalted is He, does not reveal to him on that day anything that might repel them from him. Allah, exalted is He, revealed to him then Surah al-Najm (By the star when it stetteth…) [Surah 53]. The Messenger of Allah, Allah bless him and give him peace, recited it but when he reached (Have ye thought upon al-Lat and al-‘Uzza, and Manat, the third, the other) [53:19-20], the devil put on his tongue what he had secretly wished and hoped for and said ‘these are the mighty cranes (gharaniq) and their intercession is hoped for’. When the Quraysh heard this, they were very pleased. The Messenger of Allah, Allah bless him and give him peace, carried on reciting until the end of the Surah and then prostrated. All the Muslims followed suit and prostrated, and all the idolaters who were present prostrated too. All those who were present, whether Muslim or disbeliever, prostrated except al-Walid ibn al-Mughirah and Abu Uhyahah Sa‘id ibn al-‘As who were too advanced in age and could not prostrate, but they both grabbed a handful of dust and put their foreheads on it. The Quraysh then dispersed, happy with what they heard. They said: ‘Muhammad has mentioned our idols with complimentary terms. We know that Allah gives life and takes it away, He creates and provides sustenance, but these idols of ours will intercede for us with Him. Now that Muhammad has associated them, we are all with him’. That evening, Gabriel, peace be upon him, went to the Messenger of Allah, Allah bless him and give him peace, and said: ‘What have you done? You recited to people that which I did not bring from Allah, glorified is He, and you said what I did not say to you’. (‘Ali ibn Ahmad al-Wahidi, Asbab Al-Nuzul; source; underline emphasis ours)

    The Quran further says that Muhammad was actually lost and was going astray when Allah guided him:

    He found you astray, and guided you. S. 93:7 Khalifa

    The Muslim scripture even claims that Muhammad didn’t even know what faith was until Allah decided to reveal it to him:

    Even so We have revealed to thee a Spirit of Our bidding. Thou knewest not what the Book was, nor belief; but We made it a light, whereby We guide whom We will of Our servants. And thou, surely thou shalt guide unto a straight path — S. 42:52

    It is therefore abundantly clear that Muhammad’s satan caused him major problems, especially during the period before his so-called prophetic ministry began since this is when he would have been lost and misguided according to the Quran.

    With the foregoing in perspective we are now in a position to more fully appreciate the teaching of both the Quran and the ahadith that Allah prevented Satan from touching Mary and her blessed Son:

    When she was delivered, she said: “O my Lord! Behold! I am delivered of a female child!” – and God knew best what she brought forth – “And no wise is the male like the female. I have named her Mary, and I commend her and her offspring to Thy protection from the Evil One, the Rejected.” S. 3:36 Y. Ali

    Narrated Said bin Al-Musaiyab:
    Abu Huraira said, “I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, ‘There is none born among the off-spring of Adam, but Satan touches it. A child therefore, cries loudly at the time of birth because of the touch of Satan, EXCEPT MARY AND HER CHILD.” Then Abu Huraira recited: “And I seek refuge with You for her and for her offspring from the outcast Satan” (3.36) (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 55, Number 641; see also Volume 4, Book 54, Number 506)

    Since Allah granted the request of Jesus’ grandmother by protecting him and his beloved mother from the taint and stain of Satan this means that, unlike Muhammad and his family, Jesus and the blessed Mary are the only human beings who were absolutely free from any satanic influence. The Lord Jesus and his holy mother were the only ones whom Satan could not control, could not touch, could not influence.

    Hence, contrary to Zawadi’s assertion, the hadith regarding Jesus and Mary being protected from Satan has everything to do with sinfulness/sinlessness. The narrative establishes the fact that Allah eliminated from the lives of Mary and her holy Son a chief and main cause that leads people to commit sin and evil, namely, Satan’s control and influence. This is something that Allah did not do for anyone else, not even for Muhammad whom Muslims erroneously believe was the greatest human being ever created.

    John the Baptist’s Sinlessness Examined

    John the Baptist is also sinless according to the Quran:

    There is also evidence that God blessed John the Baptist with the same miracle…

    The Birth of the Boy and His Characteristics

    This also implies what is not mentioned, that this promised boy was born and he was Yahya. There is also the implication that Allah taught him the Book, the Tawrah which they used to study among themselves. The Prophets who were sent to the Jews used to rule according to the Tawrah, as did the scholars and rabbis among them. He was still young in age when Allah gave him this knowledge. This is the reason that Allah mentioned it. Because of how Allah favored him and his parents, He says…

    (O Yahya! Hold fast to the Scripture [the Tawrah].) Means, “Learn the Book with strength.” In other words, learn it well, with zeal and studious effort…

    (And We gave him wisdom while yet a child.) This means he was given understanding, knowledge, fortitude, diligence and zeal for good and the pursuit of good. He was blessed with these characteristics even though he was young. Allah said…

    (And (made him) Hananan from Us,) [19:13] Ali bin Abi Talhah reported that Ibn `Abbas said…

    (And Hananan from Us, ) “This means mercy from Us.” `Ikrimah, Qatadah and Ad-Dahhak all said the same. Ad-Dahhak added, “Mercy that no one would be able to give except Us.” Qatadah added, “With it, Allah had mercy upon Zakariyya.” Mujahid said…

    (And Hananan from Us,) “This was gentleness from His Lord upon him.” The apparent meaning is that Allah’s statement Hananan (affection, compassion) is directly related to His statement…

    (and We gave him wisdom while yet a child.) meaning, “We gave him wisdom, compassion and purity.” This means that he was a compassionate man, who was righteous. Hanan means the love for affection and tenderness (towards others). Concerning Allah’s statement…

    (and Zakatan,) This is related to His statement…

    (And Hananan) The word Zakah means purity from filth, wickedness and sins. Qatadah said, “The word Zakah means the righteous deed.” Ad-Dahhak and Ibn Jurayj both said, “The righteous deed is the pure (Zakah) deed.” Al-`Awfi reported that Ibn `Abbas said…

    (and Zakatan,) “This means that he was a blessing.”…

    (and he was pious.)[19:13] meaning that he was pure and had no inclination to do sins. (Tafsir Ibn Kathir, Source)

    Al Suyuti states…

    and compassion, a mercy for mankind, from Us, from Our presence, and purity, a charity for them, and he was God-fearing – it is related that he never committed a sin,nor contemplated [committing] one; (Jalal ud-Din Siyuti, Tafsir al-Jalalayn, Commentary on Surah 19:13, Source)

    Narrated Said bin Al-Musaiyab:
    Abu Huraira said, “I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, ‘There is NONE born among the off-spring of Adam, but Satan touches it. A child therefore, cries loudly at the time of birth because of the touch of Satan, EXCEPT MARY AND HER CHILD.” Then Abu Huraira recited: “And I seek refuge with You for her and for her offspring from the outcast Satan” (3.36) (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 55, Number 641; see also Volume 4, Book 54, Number 506)

    If the above narration is correct then John the Baptist is one of those persons whom Satan afflicted upon his birth.

    there are specific narratives which contradict the Quran’s assertion that John is sinless. The famous Muslim historian and commentator al-Tabari sources a Muslim scholar named Qatadah who stated that:

    “Jesus and his mother did not commit any of the sins which the REST of the children of Adam commit.” (Mahmoud M. Ayoub, The Quran and Its Interpreters: The House of Imran[State University of New York Press (SUNY), 1992], Volume II, p. 94; capital and underline emphasis ours)

    John would be among the children of Adam who committed the sins which Jesus and his highly favored mother didn’t commit.

    Now Zawadi may reject the statements of the Muslim scholars on the grounds that the Quran holds greater authority and weight than the statements of some Muslim expositors. Be that as it may, Zawadi would still need to contend with the teaching of the Quran that John was sent as Jesus’ forerunner:

    And the angels called to him, standing in the Sanctuary at worship, ‘Lo, God gives thee good tidings of John, who shall confirm a Word of God, a chief, and chaste, a Prophet, righteous.’ S. 3:39 Arberry

    According to the Islamic expositors the Word which John came to confirm is Jesus Christ:

    And the angels, namely, Gabriel, called to him, standing in the sanctuary, in the temple, at worship that (anna, means bi-anna; a variant reading has inna, implying a direct speech statement) ‘God gives you good tidings (read yubashshiruka, or yubshiruka) of John, who shall confirm a Word, being, from God, namely, Jesus, that he is God’s Spirit; he is referred to as [God’s] ‘Word’, because he was created through the word kun, ‘Be’; a lord, with a following, and one chaste, forbidden from women, and a prophet of the righteous’: it is said that he never sinned and never so intended. (Tafsir al-Jalalayn; source)

    (And the angels) i.e. the Angel Gabriel (called to him as he stood praying in the sanctuary) in the mosque: (Allah giveth thee glad tidings of John) a son whose name is John, ((who cometh) to confirm a Word from Allah) Jesus son of Mary that he will be a word from Allah, created without a father, (lordly) who is clement when wronged, (chaste) has no desire for women, (a Prophet of the righteous) among the messengers. (Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn ‘Abbâs; source; bold and underline emphasis ours)

    (believing in the Word from Allah) Al-`Awfi reported that Ibn `Abbas said, and also Al-Hasan, Qatadah, `Ikrimah, Mujahid, Abu Ash-Sha`tha, As-Suddi, Ar-Rabi` bin Anas, Ad-Dahhak, and several others said that the Ayah…

    (believing in the Word from Allah) means, “Believing in `Isa, son of Maryam.” (Tafsir Ibn Kathir; source)

    That the expositors are correct can be easily proven by the fact that just several verses later this same Sura identifies Jesus as the Word from God:

    Behold! the angels said: “O Mary! God giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honour in this world and the Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to God; S. 3:45 Y. Ali

    It is in this context of John being Jesus’ forerunner that Al-Tabari wrote the following:

    “She [Mary] came to her sister who was then pregnant and to whom the birth of the Baptist had been announced. When the two met, the Baptist’s mother felt that her child was bowing within her in recognition of Jesus…” (History of Al-Tabari: The Ancient Kingdoms, translated by Moshe Perlmann [State University of New York Press (SUNY), Albany, 1987], Volume IV, p. 114; bold emphasis ours)

    And:

    “… Her sister, the wife of Zechariah, came to visit her at night. When Mary opened the door for her, the sister clung to her. The wife of Zechariah said, ‘Oh Mary, do you know I am with child?’ Mary replied, ‘Do you know, that I too am with child?’ Zechariah’s wife then said, ‘I felt that the child in me was bowing to the child in you,’ as it is written, ‘confirming the Word of God.’” (Ibid., p. 119; bold emphasis ours)

    Noted Muslim exegete Al-Qurtubi mentions Elizabeth’s visitation (called Mary’s sister) shortly after both women had conceived their sons:

    “The sister visited Mary and said, ‘O Mary, do you perceive that I am with child?’ Mary answered, ‘Do you see that I am also with child?’ Her sister went on, ‘I feel the child in my womb bowing down to the child in your womb.’”

    Al-Qurtubi also wrote that:

    “It is reported that she felt the fetus in her womb bow down with its head turned toward Mary’s womb.” (Ayoub, The Qur’an and Its Interpreters, p. 108; bold and italic emphasis ours)

    These scholars were simply echoing what is found in the inspired Gospel:

    “When Elizabeth heard Mary’s greeting, the baby leaped in her womb, and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit. In a loud voice she exclaimed: ‘Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the child you will bear! But why am I so favored, that the mother OF MY LORD should come to me? As soon as the sound of your greeting reached my ears, the baby in my womb leaped for joy.’” Luke 1:41-44

    John the Baptist was caused by God to leap in his mother’s womb in honor of Christ being the Sovereign Lord.

    With the foregoing in perspective it is rather evident that the Quran and the Islamic source material agree that Jesus is greater than John by virtue of the fact that the latter was sent to support and confirm the mission of the former. Hence, no matter from what angle Zawadi tries to look at it he will still be left with the problem that Jesus, according to the Quran and Islamic narrations, is greater than John the Baptist. He will also need to face the fact that John is greater than Muhammad since the Quran says that the Baptist is pure from birth, unlike Muhammad whom the Quran portrays as a sinner that was severely rebuked by his god and told to repent on a number of occasions. For the documentation we recommend the following

    Are repentant sinners greater than those who never sin?

    Amazingly, Zawadi actually thinks that a person who repents is somehow better than one who never sins.

    Let us assume for sake of argument that Islam teaches that Jesus is sinless and that everyone else isn’t. Does this prove his superiority? Well according to Islamic and Biblical teachings, no!

    It comes in a qudsi hadith…

    Saheeh Muslim

    Book 37, Number 6620

    Abu Sirma reported that when the time of the death of Abu Ayyub Ansari drew near, he said: I used to conceal from you a thing which I heard from Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and I heard Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: Had you not committed sins, Allah would have brought into existence a creation that would have committed sin (and Allah) would have forgiven them.

    Here I get the impression that a repentant sinner is not inferior to the sinless person. On the contrary, I see it as vice versa.

    On the contrary, what this narrative shows is that Allah is not self-sufficient and is dependant upon his creatures in order to actualize his potential. Muhammad’s statements presuppose that Allah needs sinful human beings so as to exercise his divine prerogatives of mercy and forgiveness.

    Thus, Muhammad’s claims place Zawadi in a dilemma since Muhammad basically admitted that his god had to create sinners in order to express and demonstrate his attributes and characteristics.

    For more on this issue please consult this article.

    Moreover, there is a principle in the Quran which establishes the point that the righteous and those who perform specific acts are not equal to those who are wicked or who carry out certain duties:

    What, is he who follows God’s good pleasure like him who is laden with the burden of God’s anger, whose refuge is Gehenna? An evil homecoming! S. 3:162

    Do you reckon the giving of water to pilgrims and the inhabiting of the Holy Mosque as the same as one who believes in God and the Last Day and struggles in the way of God? Not equal are they in God’s sight; and God guides not the people of the evildoers. S. 9:19

    Is one who worships devoutly during the hour of the night prostrating himself or standing (in adoration), who takes heed of the Hereafter, and who places his hope in the Mercy of his Lord – (like one who does not)? Say: “Are those equal, those who know and those who do not know? It is those who are endued with understanding that receive admonition. S. 39:9 Y. Ali

    This principle refutes Zawadi’s assertion since it proves that one who is sinless is not equal to one who sins and needs to repent, just like the one who fights in Jihad is not equal to a person who provides water for pilgrims during Hajj, or the one who knows is not equal to the individual who is ignorant.

    Did Jesus really mean that? Addressing Zawadi’s blatant distortion of the teachings of Christ

    Zawadi now quotes Jesus to prove his assertion that repentant sinners are equal to, if not better than, those who never sin.

    Jesus allegedly teaches in the Gospels…

    Luke 15:7

    I tell you that in the same way there will be more rejoicing in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who do not need to repent.

    Here I get the impression that a repentant sinner is not inferior to the sinless person. On the contrary, I see it as vice versa.

    So if according to both Islamic and Biblical teachings, the repentant sinner is not inferior to the sinless one then why would Shamoun argue that Jesus being sinless is one of the signs of his superiority over Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him?

    We already addressed Zawadi’s blatant distortion and disregard of the context of this specific passage in one of our previous rebuttals (http://answering-islam.org/Responses/Osama/zawadi_salvation.htm). Yet since our response has fallen on deaf ears it seems that we need to repeat our point once again.

    We will quote the immediate section in order to fully appreciate what Christ was actually trying to convey to his audience:

    “Now the tax collectors and ‘sinners’ were all gathering around to hear him. But the Pharisees and the teachers of the law muttered, ‘This man welcomes sinners and eats with them.’ Then Jesus told them this parable: ‘Suppose one of you has a hundred sheep and loses one of them. Does he not leave the ninety-nine in the open country and go after the lost sheep until he finds it? And when he finds it, he joyfully puts it on his shoulders and goes home. Then he calls his friends and neighbors together and says, “Rejoice with me; I have found my lost sheep.” I tell you that in the same way there will be more rejoicing in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who do not need to repent.’” Luke 15:1-7

    As can be seen from the context Christ was rebuking the Pharisees and teachers of the law for their self-righteous attitude, for thinking that they were better than those “sinners” whom Jesus was dining with. Jesus went on to use three parables as a way of explaining his reason for dining with such individuals and as a means of chastising the religious leaders for thinking that they didn’t need to repent and believe in him in order to be saved (cf. 15:8-32).

    To put this plainly, Jesus did not for a minute believe that the Pharisees and teachers of the law were so righteous that they did not need to repent. After all, according to the Holy Bible there is no human being who hasn’t and will not sin (apart from Christ that is [cf. Mark 1:10-11, 24; John 7:18; 8:29, 46; 14:30; Acts 3:14, 7:52, 22:14; 2 Corinthians 5:21; Hebrews 4:15, 7:26, 9:14; 1 Peter 1:19, 2:22, 3:18; 1 John 2:1-2; 3:3, 5, 7]):

    “When they sin against you—for there is no one who does not sin—and you become angry with them and give them over to the enemy, who takes them captive to his own land, far away or near;” 1 Kings 8:46

    “If you, O LORD, kept a record of sins, O Lord, who could stand?” Psalm 130:3

    “Do not bring your servant into judgment, for no one living is righteous before you.” Psalm 143:2

    “There is not a righteous man on earth who does what is right and never sins.” Ecclesiastes 7:20

    “This is the evil in everything that happens under the sun: The same destiny overtakes all. The hearts of men, moreover, are full of evil and there is madness in their hearts while they live, and afterward they join the dead.” Ecclesiastes 9:3

    This means that everyone needs to repent, especially the Jewish religious leaders, and confess Christ as Lord for their salvation. This is precisely what Jesus told them in another context:

    “… Jesus said to them, ‘I tell you the truth, the tax collectors and the prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God ahead of you. For John came to you to show you the way of righteousness, and you did not believe him, but the tax collectors and the prostitutes did. And even after you saw this, you did not repent and believe him.” Matthew 21:31b-32

    This leads us to our next point. Jesus was pretty much identifying himself as the shepherd, as the woman and as the prodigal son’s father of the parables since he is the one who seeks after the lost in order to save them from their sin and despair:

    “As Jesus went on from there, he saw a man named Matthew sitting at the tax collector’s booth. ‘Follow me,’ he told him, and Matthew got up and followed him. While Jesus was having dinner at Matthew’s house, many tax collectors and ‘sinners’ came and ate with him and his disciples. When the Pharisees saw this, they asked his disciples, ‘Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and “sinners”?’ On hearing this, Jesus said, ‘It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. But go and learn what this means: “I desire mercy, not sacrifice.” For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.’” Matthew 9:9-13

    “Jesus entered Jericho and was passing through. A man was there by the name of Zacchaeus; he was a chief tax collector and was wealthy. He wanted to see who Jesus was, but being a short man he could not, because of the crowd. So he ran ahead and climbed a sycamore-fig tree to see him, since Jesus was coming that way. When Jesus reached the spot, he looked up and said to him, ‘Zacchaeus, come down immediately. I must stay at your house today.’ So he came down at once and welcomed him gladly. All the people saw this and began to mutter, ‘He has gone to be the guest of a “sinner.”’ But Zacchaeus stood up and said to the Lord, ‘Look, Lord! Here and now I give half of my possessions to the poor, and if I have cheated anybody out of anything, I will pay back four times the amount.’ Jesus said to him, ‘Today salvation has come to this house, because this man, too, is a son of Abraham. For the Son of Man came to seek and to save what was lost.’” Luke 19:1-10

    Thus, repentance in the context of Luke 15 refers to turning away from sin and turning to the Lord Jesus Christ for salvation. As the Apostle Peter proclaimed by inspiration:

    “Peter replied, ‘Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.’” Acts 2:38

    “Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord… When God raised up his servant, he sent him first to you to bless you by turning each of you from your wicked ways.” Acts 3:19, 26

    “God exalted him to his own right hand as Prince and Savior that he might give repentance and forgiveness of sins to Israel.” Acts 5:31

    Hopefully, Zawadi will now get the point and refrain from perverting Jesus’ intended meaning in order to support his erroneous conclusions.

    This concludes our rebuttal. Lord Jesus willing, additional responses to the rest of Zawadi’s points will follow shortly.

    http://answering-islam.org

     

  • U.S.-trained commander of special forces Tajikistan he swore allegiance to the organization «Islamic State»

    U.S.-trained commander of special forces Tajikistan he swore allegiance to the organization «Islamic State»

    He Made a video saying “”Listen, you American pigs, I’ve been three times to America, and I saw how you train fighters to kill Muslims,” he said. “God for sure willing, I will come with this weapon to your cities, your homes, and we will kill you.”

    but Obama would love to bring 60,000 Muslims to USA from Syria!

    how many of these 60000 is like Khalimov, with the Muslims we have is not enough to keep our CIA busy and Fbia watching? do we need more?

     

  • Muslim live Debate over Israel and Black African

    Muslim live Debate over Israel and Black African

    When a Muslim try to speak as if he defend black is he truthful ?

    first till now Slavery is part of all Islamic countries, and they can not go against it because its part of the Qur’an; let us go back in history and see who fought against it and who was with it.

    William Wilberforce (1759 – 1833)

    From the http://www.bbc.co.uk/

    William Wilberforce“William Wilberforce  Wilberforce was a deeply religious English member of parliament and social reformer who was very influential in the abolition of the slave trade and eventually slavery itself in the British empire.

    William Wilberforce was born on 24 August 1759 in Hull, the son of a wealthy merchant. He studied at Cambridge University where he began a lasting friendship with the future prime minister, William Pitt the Younger. In 1780, Wilberforce became member of parliament for Hull, later representing Yorkshire. His dissolute lifestyle changed completely when he became an evangelical Christian, and in 1790 joined a leading group known as the Clapham Sect. His Christian faith prompted him to become interested in social reform, particularly the improvement of factory conditions in Britain.

    The abolitionist Thomas Clarkson had an enormous influence on Wilberforce. He and others were campaigning for an end to the trade in which British ships were carrying black slaves from Africa, in terrible conditions, to the West Indies as goods to be bought and sold. Wilberforce was persuaded to lobby for the abolition of the slave trade and for 18 years he regularly introduced anti-slavery motions in parliament. The campaign was supported by many members of the Clapham Sect and other abolitionists who raised public awareness of their cause with pamphlets, books, rallies and petitions. In 1807, the slave trade was finally abolished, but this did not free those who were already slaves. It was not until 1833 that an act was passed giving freedom to all slaves in the British empire.

    Wilberforce’s other efforts to ‘renew society’ included the organisation of the Society for the Suppression of Vice in 1802. He worked with the reformer, Hannah More, in the Association for the Better Observance of Sunday. Its goal was to provide all children with regular education in reading, personal hygiene and religion. He was closely involved with the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. He was also instrumental in encouraging Christian missionaries to go to India.

    Wilberforce retired from politics in 1825 and died on 29 July 1833, shortly after the act to free slaves in the British empire passed through the House of Commons. He was buried near his friend Pitt in Westminster Abbey”

    End of quotation from the BBC

     

    Crowther, Samuel Adjai [or Ajayi] (c. 1807-1891)

    Crowther was born with the name Ajayi in Osogun, in the Egba section of the Yoruba people, in what is now western Nigeria. When about 13, he was taken as a slave by Fulani and Yoruba Muslim raiders and sold several times before being purchased by Portuguese traders for the transatlantic market. His ship was intercepted by the British navy’s anti-slave trade patrol, and the slaves were liberated in Sierra Leone. There he became a Christian, taking at baptism the name of an eminent clergyman in England, Samuel Crowther. Excelling at school, he became a mission teacher and one of the first students of the Fourah Bay Institution, founded by the Church Missionary Society (CMS) in 1827 to train able Sierra Leoneans for Christian service. read more from http://www.bu.edu

     

    As we see one of the first fighters against slavery was captured and sold by Muslims but yet they (the Muslims) they blame the buyer not the one who capture human been and hold him in cage and sold him to white greedy man!

    even black dog is an enemy of Muhammad

    “Abu Dharr reported: The Messenger of ‘Allah (may peace be upon him) said: When any one of you stands for prayer and there is a thing before him equal to the back of the saddle that covers him and in case there is not before him (a thing) equal to the back of the saddle, his prayer would be cut off by (passing of an) ass, woman, and black Dog. I said: O Abu Dharr, what feature is there in a black dog which distinguish it from the red dog and the yellow dog? He said: O, son of my brother, I asked the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) as you are asking me, and he said: The black dog is a devil.  (Book #004, Hadith #1032)”

    Let us read from the Qur’an and Science in Depth we read;

    “ISLAM AND THE RACISM page 42

    If Muhammad is the universal prophet for all of mankind, then
    Muslims should explain why their prophet considers the black
    Africans as trouble makers that even the sky and earth are
    disgusted with their (black Africans) behaviors and voices. Let
    us loot at references from Muhammad’s own words.
    1Muhammad’s prophecy towards the black people

    The book of Kanz al-‘Ummal by Alî Muttaqî al-Hindî, vol. 11,
    p. 177.
    31117 – Narrated by Ibn Abbas from the prophet
    that Noah said, “don’t be happy that you brought
    the sons of Ham they are cursed by Noah, peace
    upon him, I swear by him whom my soul in his
    hand, I see them (the black ones) as nothing but
    the Devils traveled between the flags of
    Tribulations, they have unclear voices in their
    chest, and the voice of a zebra, storms blow
    because of their act and the earth is troubled
    because of their acts, they have no respect to my
    own people and to my religion, the one who
    reached that time, they should cry on Islam if
    they can cry.”

    Tabari, Vol. 2:21 – The Ham offsprings (Africans) are all those
    black and curly-haired, while the Japheth offsprings (Turks) are
    all those who are full-faced with small eyes, and the Shem
    offsprings (Arabs) are those who have handsome faces with
    beautiful hair. Noah prayed that the hair of Ham’s descendants
    would not grow beyond their ears, and that whenever his
    lineage meet the children of Shem, the succeeding would
    enslave them.

    Sahih Muslim, Book 0 41, Hadith 6959
    “Abu Huraira reported Allah’s ambassador (may
    Allah pray on him and salute him) his statement
    The Last Hour would not come until the Muslims”

    “fight with the Turks- people whose faces would
    be like hammered shields wearing shoes made of
    hair.”

    2The Devil is black!

    The one who will destroy the Kaaba is a black man from
    Ethiopia, before the Last Hour:
    S ahih Al – Bukhari, Book 26, Hadiths 661, 665, 666
    Reported Ibn Abbas: The Prophet said, “As if I
    were watching him, a black person with skinny
    legs tearing out the stones of the Kaaba one after
    one.”

    The same story can be found in Ibn Kathir’s interpretation and
    Sahih Al-Bukhari by following this link:
    www.qtafsir.com/index.php?
    option=com_content&task=view&id=301&Itemid=36

    End of Quotation from Qur’an and Science in Depth book by Christian Prince.

    ***
    Below is the original text in Arabic for the above translation.

    “Therefore the Negro nations are, as a rule, submissive to slavery, because [Negroes] have little [that is essentially] human and have attributes that are quite similar to those of dumb animals, as we have stated.”

    That is from Ibn Khaldun in 1377, one of the greatest Arab minds ever.

     SAHIH BUKHARI – VOLUME 3, #432:

    Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri that while he was sitting with Allah’s messenger we said, “Oh Allah’s messenger, we got female captives as our booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?”  The prophet said, “Do you really do that?  It is better for you not to do it.  No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.”

    (also refer to Bukhari Vol. 3, #718)

    FROM SAHIH BUKHARI – VOLUME 9, #506:

    Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri that during the battle with Bani Al-Mustaliq they (Muslims) captured some females and intended to have sexual relations with them without impregnating them.  So they asked the prophet about coitus interruptus.  The prophet said, “It is better that you should not do it, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection”.

    Qaza’a said, “I heard Abu Said saying that the prophet said, “No soul is ordained to be created but Allah will create it.””

     

    (also ref. Bukhari 5:459).

    FROM SAHIH BUKHARI – VOLUME 5, #637:

    Narrated Buraida:  The prophet sent Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (part of the war booty) and I hated Ali, and Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave girl from the Khumus).  I said to Khalid, “Don’t you see this (i.e. Ali)?  When we reached the prophet I mentioned that to him.  He said, “O Buraida!  Do you hate Ali?”  I said, “Yes.”  He said, “Do you hate him for he deserves more than that from the Khumus.”

     

    The note for 637 explains that Buraida hated Ali for taking from the Khumus, and Buraida thought that was not good.

    FROM SAHIH MUSLIM, VOLUME 2, #3371

    Abu Sirma said to Abu Said al Khudri:  “O Abu Said, did you hear Allah’s messenger mentioning about al-azl (coitus interruptus)?”  He said, “Yes”, and added:  “We went out with Allah’s messenger on the expedition to the Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them.  So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing azl” (withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception).  But we said:  “We are doing an act whereas Allah’s messenger is amongst us; why not ask him?”  So we asked Allah’s messenger and he said:  “It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born”.

    FROM SAHIH MUSLIM, VOLUME 2, #3432

    Abu Said al-Khudri reported that at the Battle of Hunain Allah’s messenger sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them.  Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah’s messenger seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists.  Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that:  “And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (Quran – 4:24), (i.e. they were lawful for them when their Idda (menstrual) period came to an end).

    FROM THE HADITH OF THE SUNAN OF ABU DAWUD, VOLUME 2, # 2150:

    Abu Said al-Khudri said:  “The apostle of Allah sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain.  They met their enemy and fought with them.  They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the apostle of Allah were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Quranic verse, “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess”.  That is to say, they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period.”  [The Quran verse is 4:24].

     

    The note on this Hadith says that “After the distribution of the spoils of war a man may have intercourse with the female slave after passing one menstrual period, if she is not pregnant.  If she is pregnant one should wait till she delivers the child.  This is the view held by Malik, al-Shafi and Abu Thawr.  Abu Hanifah holds that if both the husband and wife are captivated together, their marriage tie still continues; they will not be separated.  According to the majority of scholars, they will be separated.  Al-Awzai maintains that their marriage tie will continue till they remain part of the spoils of war.  If a man buys them, he may separate them if he desires, and cohabit with the female slave after one menstrual period.

     

  • Filipino maid ‘beaten and raped’ is rescued from Bahrain

    Filipino maid ‘beaten and raped’ is rescued from Bahrain

    “The rescue was prompted by the video message… She is now under the care of our embassy,” foreign ministry spokesman Charles Jose said. Philippine embassy officials and staff from Luna’s employment agency picked her up from her employer’s house, Jose said, adding that police were investigating the incident.

    Luna’s alleged assailant denied attacking her, Ricky Aragon, vice-consul at the Philippine embassy in Bahrain, said.

    In the three-minute long video, which appears to have been made on a webcam, a sobbing Luna accused her employer’s “drug addict” son of raping her. She also posted a written appeal for viewers to contact the Philippine embassy on her behalf.

    “Help me get out of here. I’m scared. Until now, my genitals hurt. My leg is bruised. He (attacker) punched my leg to immobilise me,” said the 28-year-old, who had been working in Bahrain for a year.

    “After my employer’s son abused me, he threatened to kill me and bury me in the desert if I tell anyone about what happened.”

    Luna said her employer did not believe her claims of being raped and beaten and insisted she finish the remaining two months of her contract before she could go home. Her employer also told her to have an abortion if she fell pregnant, she added.

    Luna is among an estimated 10 million Filipinos working overseas to escape poverty and high levels of unemployment in the Philippines.

    Many overseas Filipino workers, who account for a tenth of the country’s population of 100 million, work in menial jobs and endure dangerous working conditions.

    Last year, a Filipino maid, Nargelene Mendez, was rescued from a house in Saudi Arabia after posting a video on her Facebook page claiming her employer had abused her.

    In Hong Kong, Erwiana Sulistyaningsih, an Indonesian domestic worker accused her employer of subjecting her to six months of physical abuse.

    Erwiana, 23, underwent treatment at the Amal Sehat Islamic Hospital in Sragen, Indonesia, after boarding a flight from the SAR.

    Photographs of Erwiana’s injuries quickly spread through social media and led to a demonstration of thousands of people through Hong Kong’s Central district. Police arrested her employer former beautician Law Wan-tung on January 20, 2014, as she tried to board a flight to Thailand. She was sentenced to six years in prison and fined HK$15,000 earlier this year.

    Maids working in the Middle East frequently suffer abuse.

    Human Rights Watch has called on the United Arab Emirates to reform a restrictive visa system and pass a labour law to stop domestic workers are not exploited.

    www.scmp.com

     

  • Live in the Trinity TV

    Live in the Trinity TV

    Be with us today live in the Trinity Chanel at 6 PM NY time www.trinitychannel.com

    Topic of today Islam & Human rights.

  • How black magic started according to Muslims

    How black magic started according to Muslims

    From Muslims site we quot;

    “Prophet Sulaiman’s powers;Allah had bestowed Prophet Sulaiman (alaihis salam) with certain powers over mankind, Jinn and all other living creatures. Satan wanted to deprive him of this power. One day, as it was his practice, before going to answer the call of nature, Sulaiman (alaihis salam) gave his ring to a woman called Al-Jaradah. Satan took advantage of this opportunity, came in the form of Sulaiman, and took the ring from her and put the ring on. As Allah had decreed to bless the holder of the ring to have many powers, all mankind, the jinn and devils submitted to Satan. Later, when Sulaiman came seeking his ring from the woman, she accused him of being an imposter. Prophet Sulaiman endured this with patience as he knew that this was a test from Allah the Almighty

    How black magic and fortunetelling became widespread?

    With Satan having new powers, the devils were now free to do whatever they wished. It was at this time that they wrote books of black magic and buried them underneath the throne of Prophet Sulaiman (alaihis salam). Black magic and fortune telling came to the earth through these devils who (after having the new powers) would eavesdrop on the descending angels about matters decreed in the Heavens. The devils would then come down to inspire the soothsayers with it, and the latter would add to it many lies of their own. People would then believe them and regard them as trustworthy. The people started writing down these matters and the word spread among the Children of Israel that the Jinn knew the unseen.

    Later, when Allah restored to Prophet Sulaiman (alaihis salam) his kingdom, and all those who had strayed away came to follow the straight path once again, Allah the Almighty informed Sulaiman (alaihis salam) about the magic that had become commonplace among his people. This then drove Sulaiman to quickly seize and gather all these writings and put them in a chest and bury them under his throne. All the devils who tried to even approach the chest were burned alive. Prophet Sulaiman took an even harder stance declaring that he would behead anyone who claimed that the devils knew the unseen.

    Asif was Sulaiman’s scribe. He knew the Greatest Name of Allah and used to write what he was ordered to by Sulaiman and then bury it underneath the throne. After Sulaiman’s death, a devil came in the form of a human being to the people and said: “I will lead you to an everlasting treasure that will never run out.” He was referring to the writings of Prophet Sulaiman that were buried under the chest. The Satan led the people to dig under Sulaiman’s throne. To provide credibility to his word he also offered to be killed if he was not correct in his claims. After the people dug out all the writings, the devil told them that it was these writings that had given Prophet Sulaiman power over mankind, the Jinn and the birds. The devils altered these books by adding magical and blasphemous writings. The devils wrote about different types of sorcery meant to fulfill different desires.”

    Muslim link click here iqrasense.com

    is it not Amazing that an adult human-been believe in such fairytale stories, and yet they say it’s the book of God?

     

  • Qur’an And Science in Depth a book to read.

    Qur’an And Science in Depth a book to read.

    smal size v2Quran is the “Word of Allah” as revealed to His Last messenger Muhammad, is what Muslims work hard to prove to us, however Muslims use science now-days in order to convert as many as they can to Islam, but how truthful such a claim is? can Muslims backup their science or its nothing but a falsification, can the Qur’an be a book of science or Muslims make passages of the Quran by manipulating verses superficially to resemble the science, this book is going to take you step by step over what is called (The Qur’an & Modern Science) with in depth examination to find out if its Compatible or Incompatible?
    And while we are doing so; we will go through a lot of stories in the Qur’an or the Muhammad words(hadith) and we will find an answer for each scientific claim.
    Let us find out together and you be the judge!

    to order The book click here Amazon.com

  • Muhammad & Satanic Verses

    Muhammad & Satanic Verses

    The prophet of Islam, Muhammad, was possessed twice by Shaytan or Satan twice during his prophet days. Once early on he was possessed by Shaitan and spoke the Satanic Verses and the second time Mohammed was cursed by a mere Jewish man who put a black magic spell on Muhammad controlling him for many months.

    Tabari volume 6, page 107: Have you thought upon al-Lat and al-Uzza and Manat, the third, the other? (The 3 Goddesses of Mecca) “These are the high flying cranes; verily their intercession is accepted with approval”.

    The Recant: Tabari volume 6, page 109, Muhammad what have you done? You have recited to the people that which I did not bring to you from God and you said that which was not said to you.” Then the Messenger of God was much grieved and feared God greatly, but God sent down a revelation to him, for He was merciful to him, consoling him and making the matter light for him, informing him that there had never been a prophet or a messenger before him who desired as he desired and wished as he wished but that Satan had cast words into his recitation, as he had cast words on Muhammad’s tongue.”

    Koran 22:73-75: “They sought to entice you from our revelations – they nearly did -hoping that you might invent some other scripture in our name, and thus become their trusted friend. Indeed had we not strengthened your faith, you might have made some compromise with them and thus incurred a double punishment in this life and in the next. Then you should have found none to help you against us.”

    Koran 53:19-20: “Have you then considered Lat and ‘Uzza and another, the third, Manat”?

    Many that have read the Koran objectively believe that Mohammed suffered everything from delusional behavior, in its mildest form, to Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. His child bride Aisha was often concerned at his revelations:

    Excerpt from Volume 7, Book 71, Number 661: Narrated ‘Aisha:

    Magic was worked on Allah’s Apostle so that he began to imagine that he had done something although he had not. One day while he was with me, he invoked Allah and invoked for a long period and then said, “O ‘Aisha! Do you know that Allah has instructed me regarding the matter I asked Him about?” I asked, “What is that, O Allah’s Apostle?” He said, “Two men came to me; one of them sat near my head and the other sat near my feet”.

    Ibn Hisham, Al-Tabari and Al-Bukhari are three of the early biographers of Mohammed’s life, with the work of Al-Bukhari considered the most authentic book after the Koran. The Sunni Muslims, which account for up to 90 percent of the 1.5 billion Muslims worldwide, hold Al-Bukhari’s word in the highest regard. All biographers have written on Mohammed’s relationship with Satan and the many physical ‘symptoms’ he suffered when receiving a ‘revelation’ from ANY source.

     

  • Who is Jesus in Islam

    Who is Jesus in Islam

    Muslims claim a lot of respect to Jesus, and somehow this is an empty respect which mean its a statement with no value, is like saying to some one I respect you however in Islam every thing about Jesus is wrong;

    1. Wrong name (Isa) we have no Idea where Muhammad got this name from.
    2. Jesus in Islam wasn’t able to establish any thing because his book is lost.
    3. Christianity is based on False teaching.
    4. Jesus is just a normal man.
    5. Muhammad is a lot more gyrator from Jesus.
    6. Allah will not accept Jesus to intercede for man kind in Judgment day, but he will accept Muhammad.
    7. Allah will give Mary the Mother of Christ as a gift to be Muhammad wife in the life after.!

    And I will show you some quotation from Islamic site regarding this topic, however Muslims never give true answer but they have as always to go in circle as long the answer is made in English they make sweet like milk but if the questioner is an Arab then no need to play games specially if both the one is asking and the one is answering live in Islamic land.

    from the site we Quot the Question; http://islamqa.info/en/126168

    “Why do you say that Muhammad is the best of God’s creation – I do not think so – because the best of God’s creation should have no sin, and that is someone other than Muhammad, because he committed many sins. The best of God’s creation is the one over whom Satan has no power, and that is Christ. You know that the Qur’an confirms that. Similarly, Satan would not be able to put false verses on the lips of the best of God’s creation without him realising. Likewise, the best of God’s creation would never go against any command from God. And the best of God’s creation cannot be bewitched. How could the parents of the best of God’s creation be polytheists and die as polytheists? Moreover, the best of God’s creation cannot spread his religion by the sword or by paying money. You people exaggerate a great deal. If you want I can quote you the verses which prove that what I am saying is true.”

    We will read their answer and see how they try play as smart fox to fool the fool but not us!

    The Muslims answer;

    1. We are not here to compare Jesus and Muhammad (peace be upon them both), because in our religion we are forbidden to compare Prophets.
    2. Comparing and contrasting Jesus and Muhammad (peace be upon them both) is not something to be sought in our religion, and it is not appropriate for you to do that either.

    The amazing thing is as you see he just said its forbidden for a Muslim to compare between prophets, and it is not appropriate for you to do that either.?

    but even its “forbidden” he will go ahead and do?

    ” The verse: 

    This is the verse in which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

    “And (remember) when Allah took the Covenant of the Prophets, saying: ‘Take whatever I gave you from the Book and Hikmah (understanding of the Laws of Allah, etc.), and afterwards there will come to you a Messenger (Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)) confirming what is with you; you must, then, believe in him and help him.’ Allah said: ‘Do you agree (to it) and will you take up My Covenant (which I conclude with you)?’ They said: ‘We agree.’ He said: ‘Then bear witness; and I am with you among the witnesses (for this)’”

    [Aal ‘Imraan 3:81]. 

    This is a promise and a covenant that Allah, may He be blessed and exalted, took from all the Prophets, that they would believe in Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and that they would support him in his call. 

    2.     The incident 

    This was when our Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) led all the Prophets in prayer. That happened during his journey that is called al-Isra’ wa’l-Mi‘raaj (the Night Journey [from Makkah to Jerusalem] and Ascent into the heavens)]. He led all of them in prayer in Bayt al-Maqdis (Jerusalem). 

    If this is not indicative of his virtue and superiority, then we do not know of anything else that could point to that. 

    3.     The hadith 

    This is the saheeh (sound) report that was narrated from him, in which he spoke of what will happen on the Day of Resurrection when all the Prophets (blessings and peace of Allah be upon them) will refuse to intercede for the people for judgement to be passed among them. They will excuse themselves, each of them saying, “Myself, myself”, but Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) will come forward to intercede in what is known as the great intercession, saying: “I am able for it, I am able for it.” Then his Lord, may He be exalted, will honour him by accepting his intercession for the people of that gathering. That will be the station of praise and glory (al-maqaam al-mahmoud) that Allah, may He be blessed and exalted, will not bestow upon any human except him (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him). 

    “These are some of the proofs from our religious teachings that highlight the superiority of the Prophet Muhammad”

     

     But is not him who said its forbidden to do so to compare between Allah’s prophets? then he said “These are some of the proofs from our religious teachings that highlight the superiority of the Prophet Muhammad”

    that mean in order to defend Muhammad;

    1. Who care what is forbidden and what is not?
    2. Muhammad must be above what is forbidden in Islam and for hi sake you step over what Allah made to be forbidden?
    3. From where he got any way that is forbidden in Islam to compare between Allah’s claimed prophets?

    the Fact Qur’an say with clear words that Allah and Muslims should compare.Qur’an 2:253

    “We have made some of these apostles to excel the others among them are they to whom Allah spoke, and some of them He exalted by (many degrees of) rank; and We gave clear miracles to Isa son of Marium, and strengthened him with the holy spirit. And if Allah had pleased, those after them would not have fought one with another after clear arguments had come to them, but they disagreed; so there were some of them who believed and others who denied; and if Allah had pleased they would not have fought one with another, but Allah brings about what He intends.”

    Shakir translation.

    The fact in the verse we just read Allah speaking about prophets on ranks and how He(Allah) do measure his ranks of prophets

    “these apostles to excel the others among them are they to whom Allah spoke, and some of them He exalted by (many degrees of) rank; and We gave clear miracles“

    this is mean Allah from his words or who ever come with the Qur’an saying prophets can be Important depend in how many exceptions and power we give them;

    1. you are high on rank if Allah STRENGTHEN YOU WITH THE HOLY SPIRIT
    2. you are high on rank if ALLAH GAVE YOU CLEAR MIRACLES.
    3. You are high on rank if ALLAH SPEAK TO YOU.

    But Jesus has all of these, and Muhammad had none of it!!!

    1. Qur’an speak with clear words about Allah speaking directly to Jesus
      (  سورة آل عمران  , Aal-e-Imran, Chapter #3, Verse #55) “And when Allah said: O Isa, I am going to terminate the period of your stay (on earth) and cause you to ascend unto Me and purify you of those who disbelieve and make those who follow you above those who disbelieve to the day of resurrection; then to Me shall be your return, so l will decide between you concerning that in which you differed.”
      1. And the other two way to get higher on rank is to do Miracles and to be supported by the Holy Spirit and its enough to Quot one verse from the Qur’amn because there is many.
        “We have made some of these apostles to excel the others among them are they to whom Allah spoke, and some of them He exalted by (many degrees of) rank; and We gave clear miracles to Isa (Jesus) son of Marium, and strengthened him with the holy spirit.” Qur’an 2:253
        1. Jesus is Holy in the Qur’an but Muhammad is a bad sinner man
          1. (  سورة الفتح  , Al-Fath, Chapter #48, Verse #2)     “That Allah may forgive thee of thy sin that which is past and that which is to come, and may perfect His favour unto thee, and may guide thee on a right path,”
          2. (  سورة مريم  , Maryam, Chapter #19, Verse #19) “He said: “Nay, I am only a messenger from thy Lord, (to announce) to thee the gift of a holy son.”

    Jesus in Islam can create Muhammad can not & Jesus can raise you from DEATH but Muhammad can not? (  سورة آل عمران  , Aal-e-Imran, Chapter #3, Verse #49) “And a Messenger to the Seeds (Or: sons) of Israel) (saying) that, “I have already come to you with a sign from your Lord that I create for you out of clay as the semblance of a bird, then I blow into it, so it is a bird by the permission of Allah; and I heal him (who was born) blind and the leper, and give life to the dead by the permission of Allah; and I (fully) inform you of what things you eat, and what you (safely) store in your homes. Surely in that is indeed a sign for you, in case you are (true) believers.”

    Dr. Muhammad Ghali translation

    there is many I can show that even in the Qur’an Muhammad is nothing compare to Jesus as an example as long the verse above state that Jesus is Creator look what Allah of Islam say about that; (  سورة النحل  , An-Nahl, Chapter #16, Verse #17) “Is then He Who creates like one that creates not? Will ye not receive admonition?”

    Jesus is Alive Muhammad is dead

    This is all show the contradiction of the Muslims scale and how they are driving by slavery of Muhammad to the point they ignored even what is Allah their claimed god about how to be considered high on rank as prophet and they took Muhammad slef words and claim over what is called holy book!

     

  • What Allah want from Christians?

    What Allah want from Christians?

    Welcome to InvestigateIslam.com we pray that you will enjoy and learn about the Lord and his enemies.

    * تفسير Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn ‘Abbâs  Qur’an 5:14

    { وَمِنَ ٱلَّذِينَ قَالُواْ إِنَّا نَصَارَىٰ أَخَذْنَا مِيثَاقَهُمْ فَنَسُواْ حَظّاً مِّمَّا ذُكِرُواْ بِهِ فَأَغْرَيْنَا بَيْنَهُمُ ٱلْعَدَاوَةَ وَٱلْبَغْضَآءَ إِلَىٰ يَوْمِ ٱلْقِيَامَةِ وَسَوْفَ يُنَبِّئُهُمُ ٱللَّهُ بِمَا كَانُواْ يَصْنَعُونَ }

    (And with those who say: ” Lo! we are Christians ” ), i.e. the Christians of Najran (We made a covenant) in the Gospel that they should follow Muhammad (pbuh) and manifest his traits and not worship anyone or anything except Allah or associate anyone with Him, (but they forgot a part) they left part (of that whereof they were admonished) with which they were commanded. (Therefore We have stirred up) We have cast (enmity) killing and destruction (and hatred) in the hearts (among them) between the Jews and Christians; and it is said between the Nestorians of Najran, the sects known as the Jacobites, the Marqusiyya and the Melkites (till the Day of Resurrection, when Allah will inform them of their handiwork) of their opposition, treachery, concealment, enmity and hatred.
    تفسير Tafsir al-Jalalayn

    { وَمِنَ ٱلَّذِينَ قَالُواْ إِنَّا نَصَارَىٰ أَخَذْنَا مِيثَاقَهُمْ فَنَسُواْ حَظّاً مِّمَّا ذُكِرُواْ بِهِ فَأَغْرَيْنَا بَيْنَهُمُ ٱلْعَدَاوَةَ وَٱلْبَغْضَآءَ إِلَىٰ يَوْمِ ٱلْقِيَامَةِ وَسَوْفَ يُنَبِّئُهُمُ ٱللَّهُ بِمَا كَانُواْ يَصْنَعُونَ }

    And with those who say ‘We are Christians’ (this is semantically connected to [what follows]) We made a covenant, just as We did with the Children of Israel, the Jews, and they have forgotten a portion of that they were reminded of, in the Gospel, pertaining to faith and other matters, and they [too] broke the covenant. So We have stirred up, We have caused, among them enmity and hatred until the Day of Resurrection, on account of their schisms and differing whims, each sect charging the other with unbelief; and God will assuredly tell them, in the Hereafter, of what they wrought, and requite them for this.